The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Google
  Web Elsmar.com
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google.

View Full Version : How To Read OC Curves for Individual sampling plans in Z1.4 2003


qualitygoddess
1st December 2004, 06:02 PM
Can anyone explain how to read the OC curves for Individual sampling plans?

Example: I'm using sample size J and looking at the chart J at the top. I based my sample on a .15 AQL using level III (new supplier of a critical component). Let's say I just inspected 80 pieces in a 500 piece lot. I found 0 nonconforming. Does this mean if I follow the curve for a .15 AQL that 99.9...% of the lots would expect to be accepted? Similarly, if I found 5 nonconforming with same sample size and AQL (1% nonconforming), the curve shows me 45% of the lots would be accepted.

Just want to do a reality check..................

Tim Folkerts
1st December 2004, 07:10 PM
I just took a look at the chart and I'd make two suggestions...

1) If you find 5 nonconforming in the sample of 80, that would be 5/80 = 6.25%. You don't want to use the size of the whole lot to get 5/500 = 1%. It looks like the 45% number you used corresponds to 1% nonconforming on the OC curve. (I expect that you knew that but you just got typing a little faster than you were thinking ;) )

2) Your interpretation of the table is slightly turned around. The table say that if the actual quality of the lot is 1% then 45% of the lots will be rejected using this sampling scheme. That is slightly different than saying that if you found 1% nonconforming in your sample, then the actual quality is 1% nonconforming. 1% would of course be a good estimate of the true nonconformance rate, but from that single sample there would be considerable uncertainty. That means that there would be considerable uncertainty in the 45% lot rejection rate.

Does that make sense?

Tim F