weisusu
25th January 2005, 10:44 PM
I am dealing with an interesting situation at my job now and I would like people's opinion on the matter. We are currently utilizing a X-R chart to monitor power wattage for a laser operation. Since we introduce the X-bar chart, the power wattage collected tend to go out of the control limits. The process engineer had spent lots of time looking into the process to identify potential special causes but in vain. So we decided to conduct a gage R&R to see if the out of control condition has anything to do with the gage. The following are the results:
% study var for total rr = 45%
% tolerance for total rr = 12%
number of distinct categories = 2
based on the process engineer, the process is kind of "coarse" in nature so putting the power wattege into x-bar chart scrunity might have been overkilled. based on the results of rr, can i say that the meausrement system is only capable of distinguish the parts into high/low which is equivalent to pass/fail. judging from the fact that %tolerance = 12% so the measurement system is "good" to evaluate the parts against the specifications, do i have sufficient justification to collect pass/fail data and not to use the x-bar chart?
any comments are appreciated. thank you
:biglaugh:
% study var for total rr = 45%
% tolerance for total rr = 12%
number of distinct categories = 2
based on the process engineer, the process is kind of "coarse" in nature so putting the power wattege into x-bar chart scrunity might have been overkilled. based on the results of rr, can i say that the meausrement system is only capable of distinguish the parts into high/low which is equivalent to pass/fail. judging from the fact that %tolerance = 12% so the measurement system is "good" to evaluate the parts against the specifications, do i have sufficient justification to collect pass/fail data and not to use the x-bar chart?
any comments are appreciated. thank you
:biglaugh:





