amanbhai
1st May 2005, 03:46 PM
Folks I need your feedback regarding the use of computer for statistical calculations or improving the inspection efficiency.
|
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google. |
|
View Full Version : Computer usage in statistical calculation & inspection activities amanbhai 1st May 2005, 03:46 PM Folks I need your feedback regarding the use of computer for statistical calculations or improving the inspection efficiency. Jennifer Kirley 1st May 2005, 04:50 PM Folks I need your feedback regarding the use of computer for statistical calculations or improving the inspection efficiency.Your needs vary according to your capabilities, which you don't describe. I will therefore list a range of available help as I know it. There is a good book out called "Data Analysis Using (Microsoft) Excel" by Michael Middleton. This is the cheapest tool I know of, with which you can design your own analytical models. I have also used the commercially available tool Analyze-It For Microsoft Excel, which is a macros that quickly makes smart looking little charts with small data sets. As for "use of computer for improving the inspection efficiency" I am not sure I understand you. Can you please elaborate? Steve Prevette 2nd May 2005, 03:35 PM Wouldn't be any way to get out 2,200 charts and files per month without heavy automation of data processing. Wes Bucey 3rd May 2005, 12:14 PM I voted "yes" and I feel I need to elaborate It is important that folks understand what is involved in the calculations being performed by the computer, but under no circumstances should folks have to go through the grunt work and possibility of human error when doing the calculations when the tool (computer) makes it easier. Craftsmen might use hand tools in making exquisite, one-of-a-kind products, but a production house will certainly use power tools for efficiency. Atul Khandekar 5th May 2005, 05:12 AM I Agree with Wes. Computers do provide enormous power to perform complex, tedious, and repetitive calculations. The other side of it IMO is that people can sometimes get into a "Have numbers, will crunch" mode and focus entirely on the final output (such as a Cpk number or a GRR%) and forget to look at the underlying data for signals. |
|