Sean Kelley
16th February 2006, 04:26 PM
Hello all,
I have been given a Scope for Improvement by our auditor to do more on the Management Review section 5.6.2 Review Input item f). It states that we must report on changes that could affect the QMS. I have always used the changes to procedures as a basis for this. He is telling me I should expand this and include other changes. An example that he quoted was that a QC engineer was promoted to a process engineer position. As a QC Engineer he did calibrations in the lab. He thinks this is a change worth noting in management review. I view it as a resource need to be filled by the next QC Engineer which they are looking for. I believe the calibrations could also be outsourced if deemed necessary even if only temporary. Also, the old QC engineer is still here so he could be asked to perform this task when it arises if need be. Any thoughts / suggestions on possible other changes that affect the QMS would be appeciated. :thanx:
I have been given a Scope for Improvement by our auditor to do more on the Management Review section 5.6.2 Review Input item f). It states that we must report on changes that could affect the QMS. I have always used the changes to procedures as a basis for this. He is telling me I should expand this and include other changes. An example that he quoted was that a QC engineer was promoted to a process engineer position. As a QC Engineer he did calibrations in the lab. He thinks this is a change worth noting in management review. I view it as a resource need to be filled by the next QC Engineer which they are looking for. I believe the calibrations could also be outsourced if deemed necessary even if only temporary. Also, the old QC engineer is still here so he could be asked to perform this task when it arises if need be. Any thoughts / suggestions on possible other changes that affect the QMS would be appeciated. :thanx:



