The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Google
  Web Elsmar.com
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google.

View Full Version : Keeping prototype devices - Is there a regulatory or compendial requirement?


antho10359
9th March 2006, 05:36 PM
Is there a regulatory or compendial requirement to keep an actual physical representation of each medical device model or is the Device Master File containing the specifications adequate?

Thanks

Al Rosen
9th March 2006, 05:41 PM
Is there a regulatory or compendial requirement to keep an actual physical representation of each medical device model or is the Device Master File containing the specifications adequate?

ThanksI don't know what compendial means and I am not aware of a regulatory requirement, but it sure is sound business practice to keep an actual device.

antho10359
10th March 2006, 09:37 AM
That is my opinion as well so I am playing the Devil's Advocate here a bit...

Why is it a good business practice?

Thousands of dollars are tied up in not only equipment that could be sold but in storage of the devices.

The Engineering Group will say that all that is needed is a set of specifications and mechanical drawings.

fuji033
23rd March 2006, 08:59 PM
There is not any regulatory requirement to retain an actual prototype. You are required to retain device master records for any marketed device. Those describe all pertinent features etc. Some companies keep retains especially for batch production but that is not required. The emphasis in 820 and 13485 is retention of records not actual parts.