1.CAN THE MISTAKE PROOFING BE BY-PASSED? IS THERE A RED PART TEST?
> FREQUENCY?

can i get a format sample reply on the above question.:)

1.CAN THE MISTAKE PROOFING BE BY-PASSED? IS THERE A RED PART TEST?
> FREQUENCY?

can i get a format sample reply on the above question.:)

Where did the question come from? Can mistake-proofing be bypassed under what circumstances? What's a "red part test"? What does ">FREQUENCY" mean? :confused:

1.CAN THE MISTAKE PROOFING BE BY-PASSED? IS THERE A RED PART TEST?
> FREQUENCY?

can i get a format sample reply on the above question.:)

Do you mean running a red (defective) part to check the test of a test machine?

the question came from my QSA audit report.

they(coustomer) want us to make a defective part and put it in the fixture and check weather non confirming part can be made and define the frequency for the same .

so i needed a format sample?:)

This is a standard test which is usually done at setup and change of shift.
Just add the check to your normal setup sheet.
Red part past test Yes/NO
You should also have a green part to check that this works as well

If Howard's assumption is correct - it is also known as a "rabbit test" and follows Howard's red and green samples being run through to verify the device is working properly.

thanks i got the idea .

can there be a sample format for the red test?
:)

Not really. It depends upon the specific test apparatus. As Howard pointed out, this is a simple matter of having a known good part and a known defective part and running both through the test apparatus to ensure the test apparatus if functioning correctly. Quite common and in general a good idea.