The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Google
  Web Elsmar.com
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google.

View Full Version : Control Chart and Limits For Large Sample Size


ajm723
6th March 2007, 09:06 AM
Hello guys,

How do you control chart if subgroup s/s is large... like 150, without disregarding the w/in subgroup (or sample) variation? What type of control chart and how to compute control limits? Thx.:confused:

Benjamin28
6th March 2007, 09:47 AM
Your standard run o the mill Xbar-S chart is what comes to mind for me.

Tim Folkerts
6th March 2007, 03:34 PM
The fact that the subgroup size is large does not invalidate the various control charts. In fact, everything else being equal, more data is almost always better than less data!

With large subgroups, S charts give a much better estimate of the standard deviation than R charts would, so I agree with Benjamin's suggestion for Xbar-S charts.

With such a large subgroup, you will get very narrow control limits on the X-bar chart. However, when you are averaging so many points, the average should be quite close to the true mean. If the Xbar chart shows many OOC points, that means that many of the subgroups do indeed show more variation than would be expected due simply to random variations. With big subgroups, you can detect small variations. Now, these small variations that are statistically significant may not be economically significant.

If you expect some variations between subgroups in addition to the variations within a subgroup, then you might calculate the average for each subgroup and plot that set of points on an I-MR chart. Basically you are admitting that there is long-term variation that is not accounted for within the subgroups, and you are just looking at the long-term trends. An OOC point on the I chart tells you that a subgroup's mean shows an unusual amount of variation (and the usual variation is already larger than predicted within the subgroups).


Tim F

bobdoering
18th March 2007, 09:47 AM
I am curious, what kind of process are you doing that requires 150 samples per check to predict its performance?

Atul Khandekar
18th March 2007, 05:45 PM
I am curious, what kind of process are you doing that requires 150 samples per check to predict its performance?I guess ajm723 is talking about this ?
Tight Control Limits - Tape & Reel Process, the process of packaging ICs (http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=20694)