The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Google
  Web Elsmar.com
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google.

View Full Version : TUR's to alpha / beta risk factors


drikwah
17th March 2007, 06:38 AM
:bonk: Has anyone performed a alpha / beta risk estimate to TUR's or GRR's.
I would be interested in information pertaining to calculations for this.:bonk:

Jim Wynne
17th March 2007, 12:51 PM
:bonk: Has anyone performed a alpha / beta risk estimate to TUR's or GRR's.
I would be interested in information pertaining to calculations for this.:bonk:

It would help if you clarified your question a bit. I don't know what you mean by "TUR," but I hope it's not this (http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/default.asp?page=2873). :cool:

Do you want to take something like GR&R data and somehow translate it into risk estimates for supplier and customer?

Miner
17th March 2007, 12:57 PM
Do you want to take something like GR&R data and somehow translate it into risk estimates for supplier and customer?

If this is what you're after, a gage performance curve should provide what you are looking for.

BradM
17th March 2007, 01:31 PM
If you mean test uncertainty ratios:

http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=1050

The only thing I remember seeing was in a textbook. I think it was in the ASQ metrology book, where obtaining higher TUR would change the associated risks.

Wesley Richardson
17th March 2007, 04:04 PM
Hi Drikwah,

I have not performed the analysis that you are suggesting. However, I have determined measurement uncertainty. Part of that analysis is the coverage factor, k. When k = 2, the confidence interval is 95 %, therefore the alpha risk or level of significance is 1 - 95 % = 5 % at that k. Similar statements can be made for k = 2.5, k = 3, or other k values.

Wes R.

drikwah
18th March 2007, 07:07 AM
No Jim, not that. Test uncertainty ratio. I am attempting to assemble a spreadsheet showing the relationship of TUR's to Alpha / Beta Risks. This would be very similar to taking GRR data and translating it into risk estimates.
I would like to do this with TUR and GRR.

drikwah
18th March 2007, 08:04 AM
Wes, I believe this would be for the uncertainty budget part of the study that the TUR would be derived from. I would then from this uncertainty budget perform a TUR to the part or device being measured. Now I want to correlate this TUR to the alpha / beta risks.
An example would be from a simple type B uncertainty where the gage accuracy is .0001". The part or device to be verified has a tolerance .001".
giving a TUR of 10:1. The uncertainty budget would be .001005" (Type B) so now I want to know the alpha / beta risk values. Miner suggested the gage performance curve. I will examine this also.

drikwah
18th March 2007, 08:20 AM
Brad,
That is correct. I would like to create a chart showing the associated risks or correlation of TUR's to the alpha / beta risks. I have seen references to the gage performance curve but I don't know how to create one.

Wesley Richardson
18th March 2007, 10:07 AM
Hi Dirkwah,

If you have determined the combined measurement uncertainty, the k value is basically one standard deviation. Although the distributions of the uncertainty factors from each contribution may not be normal, the combined uncertainty is approximately normal.

Using a z distribution calculation, you can then determine the alpha risk as a function of the distance in standard deviation units from the population mean, which is estimated from your sample mean. Note use a t distribution if your sample size is less than 30.

The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis would be:
H_0: mu < mu_0
H_1: mu > mu_0

Where mu_0 is the comparison value.

Wes R.

Hershal
19th March 2007, 10:37 AM
Is this to be the uncertainty study for the entire test method? If so, then a full analysis should be done, in which the calibration uncertainties are a piece, but ONLY a piece, of the whole.....and very likely the least significant piece.....

Hershal

drikwah
19th March 2007, 01:21 PM
Hershal,
sort of, but no. Just an example of what I'm after. The question that I am trying to answer is basically what is the difference in tha alpha/beta risks at differnet TUR's. Now if I have a specific TUR (Type B) how do I calculate the alpha/beta risks? I am hoping to do this in excel.

Hershal
19th March 2007, 03:50 PM
I seem to have misinterpreted the alpha and beta risks as Types A and B uncertainty components.....it appears I have a bit to learn.....

Hershal

drikwah
19th March 2007, 05:16 PM
Hershal,

Sorry if I am not clear on this. I believe these are also sometimes referred to as type I and type II risks. The risk of passing a bad part or failing a good one. I have created a Gage Performance Curve in excel based on the instructions given in the AIAG reference manual 1st edition. I am not sure it is working correctly since the example given isn't exactly the same.
If and when I get the bugs out of it I will post it on this site.