View Full Version : "Inspection Culture " to "Quality Assurance Culture" - Upcoming Job Interview
George.Temperley 5th October 2007, 05:13 PM As part of a big job interview I have to give a 15 Minute Presentation
How would you move a organisation from a "Inspection Culture" to a "Quality Assurance Culture"
Ie move away from over inspection ie put onus on operator critical dimension checks only etc
Getting long serving employees who are set in their ways to using the modern tools & techniques. 5S Kazien etc
Any documents or threads that might help me would be most appreciated even the odd comments from anyones experience in a similar situation Even more so some document or extract from a book ect ect
Jennifer Kirley 5th October 2007, 05:57 PM Well George, the first thing to understand--and I don't--is who your audience is.
Their positions matter okay, but more importantly you must understand why they asked for this particular subject. Are they trying to understand how well you understand QC vs. QA, your philosophy or are they in a mood for change and want a champion? Your message must be crafted with this understanding in mind. If you don't understand this company well enough to know the answer right now, you need to find out.
Here (http://elsmar.com/Forums/search.php?searchid=985743) is a list of threads I searched out using the words "change culture".
As culture success stories go, here (http://www.texas-quality.org/SiteImages/125/Reference%20Library/Texas%20Nameplate%20-%202.pdf) is a story that I like; you can refer to it.
How to get the old warriors to play? Make change non-threatening. Make it plain that in order for them to do well, the company must do well first. For those who need reward, define an appropriate reward. Then make sure the company follows through with whatever reward is promised.
I hope this helps!
Stijloor 5th October 2007, 06:19 PM As part of a big job interview I have to give a 15 Minute Presentation
Hello George,
Jennifer provided you with outstanding advice. I would like to suggest that you study this organization's background; its product, customers, reputation, successes, failures, etc. Keep an open mind while doing this. In the US, a lot of information about companies is considered public record, I do not know about the UK. The more you know, the better you can prepare. Focus on the main stakeholders' needs and how the organization could benefit from a change of course. Be clear on the terminology though, because "Inspection Culture" and "Quality Assurance Culture" may mean different things to different people. Your presentation should include a clarification of these terms.
Wishing you lots of success!
Stijloor.
sridharafep 5th October 2007, 10:46 PM Good topic. As every Quality Manager like to do this but....
I too would like to focus on this in our company. But very difficult to implement. Need culture, complete understanding - down the level. Strong Engineering design / integrity.
I suggest, a few process could be tested / implemented on this to gauge the success.
All the best for u r...
Sridhar
Wes Bucey 6th October 2007, 12:40 AM Just a thought:
Essentially you are being asked to say how you would move an organization from:
trying to inspect Quality into
Building Quality inIn other words, doing what Deming and most other modern Quality folk have been trying to do for forty or more years - instill a culture of
Prevention versus detection.
If you are familiar with the concept, it shouldn't be too difficult a story to tell. If you aren't familiar with the concept, talking about details like Six Sigma, Kaizen, reingineering, TQM, et cetera, will just confuse everyone. You'e got 15 minutes - use part of it to give the concept in plain language and the balance to tell how you would move to be the "Change Agent" who helps folks WANT to change to make their own lives easier and more efficient.
Ajit Basrur 6th October 2007, 04:21 AM Hi George,
In addition to the excellant responses so far, I would like to add some points. The QA culture in any organization mainly refers to -
Promotion of quality culture
Systematic approach to quality assessment
Coherent and transparent system structure
Commitment to quality improvement
Confidence building
And as Wes rightly said, its Prevention vs detection or, Proactive Approach vs Reactive Approach.
I managed to get a presentation on Total Quality Management which is a very good presentation. You could get some additional points from that too :)
Wish you the very best for the interview :agree:
George.Temperley 6th October 2007, 09:52 AM Hello George,
Jennifer provided you with outstanding advice. I would like to suggest that you study this organization's background; its product, customers, reputation, successes, failures, etc. Keep an open mind while doing this. In the US, a lot of information about companies is considered public record, I do not know about the UK. The more you know, the better you can prepare. Focus on the main stakeholders' needs and how the organization could benefit from a change of course. Be clear on the terminology though, because "Inspection Culture" and "Quality Assurance Culture" may mean different things to different people. Your presentation should include a clarification of these terms.
Wishing you lots of success!
Stijloor.
Thanks very much for your comments
wmarhel 6th October 2007, 09:56 AM If you are familiar with the concept, it shouldn't be too difficult a story to tell. If you aren't familiar with the concept, talking about details like Six Sigma, Kaizen, reingineering, TQM, et cetera, will just confuse everyone. You'e got 15 minutes - use part of it to give the concept in plain language and the balance to tell how you would move to be the "Change Agent" who helps folks WANT to change to make their own lives easier and more efficient.
Wes makes a great point. There is no "magic" wand that can create this change, it is something that takes time and discipline....lot's of discipline. By the same token, I would stress how it is necessary for the entire organization to be disciplined in this approach as defects can be created by an administrative function as quickly as one from manufacturing. Think about the number of times that a work order or job routing sheet was incorrect and created defects/rework.
Let the interviewers know that as the champion, you would be the main resource and talk about your ability to create a level of trust with your co-workers. If they don't trust you, they will be less likely to follow your lead.
Best of luck.........
Wayne
sridharafep 6th October 2007, 02:49 PM Thanks - very good - simple presentation.
"Promotion of quality culture
Systematic approach to quality assessment
Coherent and transparent system structure
Commitment to quality improvement
Confidence building"
It is a challenge for any Quality Manager / Engineer to change from QC to QA.
Sridhar
gpainter 8th October 2007, 09:35 AM Pretty simple. Do a power point with capital YOU and tell them that is where it starts. Top management moves the mountains.
ScottK 8th October 2007, 10:11 AM Hi George -
All great responses and I think Qualityalways nailed what I'm trying to do right on the head.
I am in the process of doing exactly what you have to present.
and gpainter has the other piece of the puzzle - senior management support.
Give examples of how you would expect them to support the effort.
for example - I make all senior management attend training classes with everyone else, from the janitor to the supervisors.
Pull no punches about the time involved. It's not going to happen in 6 month or a year. Perhaps put together a sample gantt chart with the key steps/programs and estimates of time based on what you know about the org.
Murphy's Law 22nd October 2008, 01:24 AM I don't know if this going to be enough time to benefit your interview or not but IT DEPENDS....
1. It depends on the technologies you are working with : Are you a basic material supplier or are you building complex devices? If you are more advanced products, then you can design in X: X = margin, X = reliability ie/ capability / robustness. These can be characterized upfront with good DOEs to understand your risk of process drifts. Build in guardbands to your productions tests to ensure consistent peformance.
2. It depends on the stability of your manufacturing process: If your SPCs on critical parameters that impact Q&R are under control, you don't need inspection.
3. It depends on the techology maturity. If mature technology that is well understood, and stable you don't need so much inspection.
4. Install Statistical based controls for OOC or outlier material and solid reaction plans.
Inspections per se are just added costs. Understand what QCs or samples should be targeting.
Stijloor 22nd October 2008, 01:35 AM I don't know if this going to be enough time to benefit your interview or not but IT DEPENDS....
1. It depends on the technologies you are working with : Are you a basic material supplier or are you building complex devices? If you are more advanced products, then you can design in X: X = margin, X = reliability ie/ capability / robustness. These can be characterized upfront with good DOEs to understand your risk of process drifts. Build in guardbands to your productions tests to ensure consistent peformance.
2. It depends on the stability of your manufacturing process: If your SPCs on critical parameters that impact Q&R are under control, you don't need inspection.
3. It depends on the techology maturity. If mature technology that is well understood, and stable you don't need so much inspection.
4. Install Statistical based controls for OOC or outlier material and solid reaction plans.
Inspections per se are just added costs. Understand what QCs or samples should be targeting.
The OP posted the question in October 2007. We do not know how the interview turned out....
Stijloor.
Wes Bucey 22nd October 2008, 02:13 AM The OP posted the question in October 2007. We do not know how the interview turned out....
Stijloor.
Sure - the original poster may be long gone, but the question and situation are as relevant today as the minute the OP clicked the "submit" button. So are the answers!
There are still a lot of organizations which are mired in a mindset where the bosses are operating as if The Red Bead Experiment devised by Deming is an ideal process plan!
So - thanks to George for the original post and to Murphy's Law for reviving the thread:thanx:
Jennifer Kirley 23rd October 2008, 09:36 AM I fixed the broken link for Texas Nameplate Company's story.
Stijloor 23rd October 2008, 09:42 AM I fixed the broken link for Texas Nameplate Company's story.
Here is the post + links (http://elsmar.com/Forums/showpost.php?p=217473&postcount=2) that Jennifer was referring to.
Excellent story by the way.....:agree1:
Stijloor.
|
|