sberg
4th January 2008, 10:36 AM
I would like to get an alternative perspective on a recertification process for expired shelf life materials. My intial thought is that I would handle the recertification by treating expired shelf life materials as non-conforming and sending them through the MRB. Anyone have any experiences with this?
If I decide to go that seperate route of a stand alone procedure then I am a bit hung up between where to place this procedure in the quality manual. I would assume that this would be placed under the umbrella of preservation of product? Any thoughts on this?
Thanks
Ajit Basrur
4th January 2008, 11:30 AM
Can you provide more info which type of expired materials are you referring to ?
Scott Catron
4th January 2008, 12:13 PM
I think it really depends on what sort of material we're talking about.
For chemicals or materials dependent on chemical stability, if there is sufficient stability data to support an extension, then a MRB could review the data and approve an extended shelf life. We've done this before on drug intermediates.
sberg
4th January 2008, 12:20 PM
The type of materials would be heat shrink tubing and epoxies mainly.
Al Rosen
4th January 2008, 12:21 PM
I would like to get an alternative perspective on a recertification process for expired shelf life materials. My intial thought is that I would handle the recertification by treating expired shelf life materials as non-conforming and sending them through the MRB. Anyone have any experiences with this?
If I decide to go that seperate route of a stand alone procedure then I am a bit hung up between where to place this procedure in the quality manual. I would assume that this would be placed under the umbrella of preservation of product? Any thoughts on this?
Thanks I would address it in the Nonconforming material procedure. MRB is usually not qualified to determine if the material is still acceptable, but could decide to return it to the mfr for testing. I'm assuming it's chemicals, adhesives or rubber o-rings & gaskets.
sberg
4th January 2008, 12:26 PM
Thanks for your insight into this.
Scott Catron
4th January 2008, 12:32 PM
The type of materials would be heat shrink tubing and epoxies mainly.
Is there any data to suggest the shelf life could be extended?
And not to disagree with Al, but if the material is currently not nonconforming to specifications, it may not be wise to kick it into the NCM process - depends on one's system and how these things are reported. If it's more of a procedural change - a change in the shelf life - then it probably belongs in the change control system.
Al Rosen
4th January 2008, 12:35 PM
A procedure for controlling the materials is neccesary, but once the expiration date has passed, it is nonconforming material in my opinion.
sberg
4th January 2008, 12:40 PM
I think we would most likely scrap the materials. We are a small facility and do not have much of an ability to recertify things. But you still have to have the procedure. A statement that we will not use any materials that have expired doesn't seem to cut it with me.
Al Rosen
4th January 2008, 01:01 PM
Here's a draft of a procedure that might need a little work.
Phil Fields
4th January 2008, 01:09 PM
We perform a quarterly Shelf Life audit. All products found to be outside of its shelf life is put through our Nonconforming Material process. The disposition for this product is SCRAP. We must follow the manufactures recommendation, we do not have the competency to judge if we can extend a shelf life.
Phil
S Roche Hendrix
4th January 2008, 01:43 PM
We use our nonconforming material system to manage expired materials. We consider Shelf Life a specification therefore expired would be nonconforming. The process is;
1. Materials Management department monitors and ensures materials are not expired before scheduling for use.
2. When expired material is identified an NCMR is issued. This puts the product on hold and ensures it will not be used. It is assigned to the engineering department to evaluate.
3. Typically a chemical engineer will conduct a Potential Problem Analysis (PPA) for this material going past its shelf life. He will identify the impact and tests to be conducted to assure its quality prior to use.
4. The evaluation/test results are entered into the NCMR system with a recommendation for disposition, scrap or use, based on the test results.
5. The recommended disposition is approved by management.
6. After approval, Materials Management is notified. If disposition is to use then they are responsible for scheduling. If disposition is to scrap then they will ensure the discard is handled properly (with the help of EHS, if needed).
If we find the Shelf Life specification can be extended, we use our Management Of Change system to make the change.
Susan