Roger Eastin
18th January 2000, 02:48 PM
Has anyone received the TS16949 package from AIAG? This includes the auditor requirements and the customer-specific requirements. I think AIAG call it the "TS-4pack" or something like that.
|
|
View Full Version : AIAG's TS16949 Auditor requirements and customer-specific requirements Roger Eastin 18th January 2000, 02:48 PM Has anyone received the TS16949 package from AIAG? This includes the auditor requirements and the customer-specific requirements. I think AIAG call it the "TS-4pack" or something like that. Howard Atkins 19th January 2000, 12:17 AM When I asked about a month ago they said it was not yet available Roger Eastin 19th January 2000, 09:26 AM Maybe I'm jumping the gun here. I have heard that AIAG stated that the complete package would be available by the end of the year. Christian Lupo 19th January 2000, 10:30 AM I woulnd't doubt it, they have not approved the the criteria for becoming a certified TS auditor yet, and they have not published the accreditation criteria for becoming a registrar yet either. So it will be a while before the 4 pack is ready. Dirk Jansen 19th January 2000, 11:24 AM The AIAG informed me today that the 4-pack will be available in Feb-2000. Regards Elberth Ardila Tabera 21st January 2000, 11:39 AM Could you help me, where can I buy the 4 package? AIAG, web site or addres or phone. Thanks you ------------------ Roger Eastin 21st January 2000, 04:12 PM I believe you have to contact AIAG by phone at 248-358-3003. Dirk Jansen 27th January 2000, 11:50 AM Today, the AIAG informed me that they can not supply the 4-pack, They don't know when or if it will be available. To order TS16949, look at www.aiag.org (http://www.aiag.org) > products Regards, Dirk Jansen Roger Eastin 27th January 2000, 03:06 PM This is kind of curious for an organization that publishes the requirements! They don't know when or IF they'll have all the requirements?! Wow. Makes you want to hop right into the TS16949 bandwagon! This is not exactly the kind of start I thought this standard would have(in the US, anyway). Marc 28th January 2000, 10:27 AM Originally posted by Roger Eastin: This is kind of curious for an organization that publishes the requirements! Surprise! |
|