The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Google
  Web Elsmar.com
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google.

View Full Version : Approving Suppliers - Consultants


Bob the QE
1st May 2008, 09:58 AM
This is from an earlier post that did not get much response so I thought I would try again.

We are entering the AS9100 registration process and are receiving assistance from a consultant and are going with our current ISO registrar. So thinking of the consultant as a supplier I wonder what your thoughts are on these, (even if you are a consultant):
a) Do we need to show any evidence of certification or professional accreditation of the consultant, if they are providing training services, especially internal auditing training?
b) It appears that one opinion is that the OASIS data base along with a third party accreditation of the registrars is not enough evidence of evaluation, am I understanding this correctly? If so why not?
I can see the point of having the registrar listed on the ASL, no confusion there.

I appreciate the consideration and thanks for your insights.

harry
28th May 2008, 12:05 PM
Considering that this is the second attempt by Bob, please try to help out.

AndyN
28th May 2008, 12:16 PM
This is from an earlier post that did not get much response so I thought I would try again.

We are entering the AS9100 registration process and are receiving assistance from a consultant and are going with our current ISO registrar. So thinking of the consultant as a supplier I wonder what your thoughts are on these, (even if you are a consultant):
a) Do we need to show any evidence of certification or professional accreditation of the consultant, if they are providing training services, especially internal auditing training?
b) It appears that one opinion is that the OASIS data base along with a third party accreditation of the registrars is not enough evidence of evaluation, am I understanding this correctly? If so why not?
I can see the point of having the registrar listed on the ASL, no confusion there.

I appreciate the consideration and thanks for your insights.

Bob:

I'm not sure why you didn't get a response. However, IMHO, you don't need to have any evidence (to satisfy AS) - what you do need is to assure yourself that you go what you wanted from them.

The consultant doesn't really affect product etc. and your people are responsible for implementation, so I wouldn't get too tied up over proving the worth of the consultant.

If the consultant actually does audits, then the cons. qualifications would be useful to keep on file. If a CB auditor asks about the trainers quals. the proof is - somewhat - in your implementation.......

SteelMaiden
28th May 2008, 02:24 PM
How do you decide to hire one consultant above another? You have already put some sort of evaluation criteria into place, so why not make it official and put them on the approved supplier list? After all, this person has the power to make or break your system as far as your employees are concerned and they are the ones you should be thinking of first in the implementation of a system:2cents:

(i don't know why the first attempt at posting this did not give you any results either...)

Coury Ferguson
28th May 2008, 02:33 PM
I have moved this post since it is asking specific questions regrading the AS9100 standard on Supplier Selection/Evaluation.

Another Moderator may move this post.

vanputten
28th May 2008, 02:35 PM
I know this is an AS9100 question but you could review for reference, the standard "ISO 10019 Guidelines for the selection of quality management system consultants and use of their services."

Coury Ferguson
28th May 2008, 02:50 PM
This is from an earlier post that did not get much response so I thought I would try again.

We are entering the AS9100 registration process and are receiving assistance from a consultant and are going with our current ISO registrar. So thinking of the consultant as a supplier I wonder what your thoughts are on these, (even if you are a consultant):
a) Do we need to show any evidence of certification or professional accreditation of the consultant, if they are providing training services, especially internal auditing training?
b) It appears that one opinion is that the OASIS data base along with a third party accreditation of the registrars is not enough evidence of evaluation, am I understanding this correctly? If so why not?
I can see the point of having the registrar listed on the ASL, no confusion there.

I appreciate the consideration and thanks for your insights.

I looked at the other thread that you mentioned:

Approving Suppliers under 7.4.1 - AS9100 (http://elsmar.com/Forums/showpost.php?p=246393&postcount=18)

There were responses, they may not have directly related with Consultants, but did talk about Registrars.

The forum that you reposted your question was in the Training Distant Learning, which really didn't apply to your question. You may want to try going back to the original question/post and bump it up or re-quote your question.

kiwisfly
11th June 2008, 07:00 AM
Hi Bob
I'm an AS9100 / AS9110 Auditor listed on OASIS. I have rarely seen a certification body / registrar on a company's ASL. As noted in responses above, the CB is not involved in the supply chain therefore your purchasing controls probably don't apply.

As for the consultant, if the company has the consultant completing internal audits or has provided AS audit training to in-house auditors then I normally ask for evidence that the trainer is competent to audit and/or to train and the scope of the training course. I follow the same process as I would for any other competency in an aerospace company. These are more training records than supplier approval records however.

I hope this helps.

Cheers

tomstwincam
12th June 2008, 08:25 AM
Hello Everyone.

I am in my 4th day today of our AS9100 Assesment at the company I work for. The auditor covered the ASL yesterday. Our consultant that helped us get ready for AS9100 gave us a minor NC during his pre-assesment audit for not having the registrar and himself as approved suppliers. Some auditors don't ask for it some do. What we did is send them both or supplier survey, they returned it signed with their certifications attached and done they were on the list. We do not give them a rating, their continued use is by continued certification of our company. I believe there is more risk not having them then just added them per your supplier approval procedure. It doesn't hurt to have them on there, but if the auditor you get asks and they are not on there then you will get a NC.

Also we contracted our consultant to do a full system audit for us and the first thing the auditor that has been here this week asked for was his credentials. If you have your consutant do your audits have him give you a photo copy of his credentials and attch them to the audit.