Scenario:

We are a EASA Pt 21 Subpart G POA and release our components to the Middle East using a the EASA Form 1. Some of these components now need repair but we are not a EASA Pt 145 organisation. We have found an organisation that can repair and release the parts on a 8130-3 form. Would this be acceptable or would we need to notify the Customer that he will receive a 8130-3 release instead of an EASA Form 1.

I have moved this post since I believe we are talking about FAA requirements.

If not, let any of the Moderators know and they will move it back. You can either PM one or use the "Report Post" button.

If the FAA 145 is also EASA certified then they can issue a dual release 8130. This dual release is equivalent to a form 1. You can also require that the 145 issue a Form 1 instead of the 8130.

For those on this side of the pond there are no bilaterials other than Israel and so the FAA form signed as part 21 or 145 has not real legal basis ( though it may be contractualy required). Not sure how EASA covers the equilivant of Bilaterials.
Here is the FAA link
http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/international/bilateral_agreements/baa_basa_listing/

:2cents: