fletch
14th October 2008, 11:14 AM
I'd like to throw this out for you guys for your thoughts. I was performing a review of RMA's to come up with some trends(area for improvements), and discovered that some of the RMA's weren't actually returns from customers.
The product never physically left the building, however, the job was closed out prior to shipping. It could be that an issue came up prior to actually shipping the product to the customer (that dead zone between mfg and shipping, or shipping and it physically leaving). Then an RMA would be generated from inside sales to receive the material back into stock and a new order would be placed for the correct amount.
This inflated my number of RMA's and the RMA $ amount. This gave an unrealistic picture of my returns and what the real problem is.
Unfortunately, our excellent system (oracle) works this way. There is no way once it has shipped systematically to bring it back into the system without generating and RMA. Then the paperwork needs to go back through accounting and they make the changes.
I met with management and came up with the idea of creating a mirror system that would be called Internal Transaction Return.
(am I making too much of this here???)
Where instead of an RMA it would be an ITR with a different form for accounting. I think it would solve the issue of RMA's and I would see a more clear picture.
thoughts???
The product never physically left the building, however, the job was closed out prior to shipping. It could be that an issue came up prior to actually shipping the product to the customer (that dead zone between mfg and shipping, or shipping and it physically leaving). Then an RMA would be generated from inside sales to receive the material back into stock and a new order would be placed for the correct amount.
This inflated my number of RMA's and the RMA $ amount. This gave an unrealistic picture of my returns and what the real problem is.
Unfortunately, our excellent system (oracle) works this way. There is no way once it has shipped systematically to bring it back into the system without generating and RMA. Then the paperwork needs to go back through accounting and they make the changes.
I met with management and came up with the idea of creating a mirror system that would be called Internal Transaction Return.
(am I making too much of this here???)
Where instead of an RMA it would be an ITR with a different form for accounting. I think it would solve the issue of RMA's and I would see a more clear picture.
thoughts???





