ScottK
16th January 2009, 11:40 AM
We are doing a custom Stainless Steel part where we need the surface finish on the end of a fitting needs to be Ra < 10 microinches because it's a metal to metal seal for gas media.
We have a surface tester but the seal is a small lobe or bump on the fitting end that is too small for our surface tester to ride on:
http://elsmar.com/jpg/faceseal.jpg
image grabbed of the internet and I put inthe text.
(very similar to a Swagelok "VCR" seal if you're familiar with these fittings)
We will be roller burnishing the lobe and bore AND sending the part for electro polishing.
I'm proposing the following:
1) Acquire a traceable visual standard for 10 Ra microInches
2) Sample the parts after electro polishing and test an appropriate number on the surface tester on the inner bore. If this is 10 or less AND, under magnification, the lobe looks comperable to the standard with no defects it's good.
It's a tough standard, but it's not for enough parts to justify more than a traceable visual standard, equipmentwise.
Thoughts?
We have a surface tester but the seal is a small lobe or bump on the fitting end that is too small for our surface tester to ride on:
http://elsmar.com/jpg/faceseal.jpg
image grabbed of the internet and I put inthe text.
(very similar to a Swagelok "VCR" seal if you're familiar with these fittings)
We will be roller burnishing the lobe and bore AND sending the part for electro polishing.
I'm proposing the following:
1) Acquire a traceable visual standard for 10 Ra microInches
2) Sample the parts after electro polishing and test an appropriate number on the surface tester on the inner bore. If this is 10 or less AND, under magnification, the lobe looks comperable to the standard with no defects it's good.
It's a tough standard, but it's not for enough parts to justify more than a traceable visual standard, equipmentwise.
Thoughts?





