The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Google
  Web Elsmar.com
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google.

View Full Version : Acceptance criteria for visual defects of electronic components


rameshs_10377
28th February 2009, 01:05 AM
Hi

i m an in charge for inward good inspection in electronic manufacturing industry ,

i have a few problem while accepting the components, i m unable to fix the acceptance criteria for visual inspection for electronic component

eg: we received the ceramic disc capacitor where the powder coating near lead got damaged during forming of lead . , these components used for medical project

i know there is no harm to performance of the component but i could not able to convince our production team with our proof

Please help me to sort out this issue by providing the acceptance criteria for visual defects :mad:

Requirement of AS9100 and 13485

Please help

ramesh:bonk:

harry
28th February 2009, 03:16 AM
Please help me to sort out this issue by providing the acceptance criteria for visual defects

So you want us, people who do not know anything about your product, what market segment you served, which/what clients you served and what product you manufacture to provide acceptance criteria to you for something very subjective? Doesn't make sense isn't?

Such criterias should normally come from your customer. If not then you need to set one yourself (within your organization) - make sure you do it in consultation with people who are experienced enough to know the market in general as well as what others are doing.

If you already had one, do you have customer complains on this issue? If so, you may need to tighten. If not, why do you need to change it since you mentioned that it does not affect performance.

JaneB
28th February 2009, 03:24 AM
Rameshs,

Find a couple of people to work with you on this. THey need experience & especially must know what 'good' things should look like and what 'bad things' might look like.

Go through a number of items (eg, stuff already accepted), and get them to talk aloud about what makes each thing/s 'good/OK to accept'. You may need to ask them specific questions to prompt them.

Once you've got that list of criteria, then turn attention to the opposite. Ask them to give you examples / identify 'bad ones' that should not be accepted or that require review.

One good way to do this may be to take pictures (digital cameras make this easy) and use them as illustrative examples (eg, post on wall in inspection place). If/next time something is accepted that shouldn't have been, find out why and add that to the pics/list.

It will take you a little while, but you need to develop these criteria internally. Plus it gets people involved, which is always a good thing.

rameshs_10377
28th February 2009, 05:26 AM
Dear Jane

Thanks for your inputs , it helped me to proceed further in problem solving

thanks a lot

regards

ramesh

JaneB
28th February 2009, 10:46 PM
Rameshs,
You're welcome. Don't ignore customer perception either as Harry points out.

Even if something doesn't affect performance (I don't know what, because I don't know the product, but suppose it was fine scratches on what's normally a smooth surface), if your customers don't like the look, & thus get a perception that what you produce 'isn't good' - even if it works perfectly, they'll not be happy.