IGORTS
18th February 2002, 07:28 AM
Hi,
Has someone a R&R file ( Excel or any other format ) avaible in order to send it me?
Regards
Has someone a R&R file ( Excel or any other format ) avaible in order to send it me?
Regards
|
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google. |
|
View Full Version : Gage R&R Form - Excel or other - Calculations Questions IGORTS 18th February 2002, 07:28 AM Hi, Has someone a R&R file ( Excel or any other format ) avaible in order to send it me? Regards Arte 18th February 2002, 12:14 PM I have one in spanish languaje, is it useful for you? Arte::smokin: IGORTS 19th February 2002, 03:13 AM Of course, thank you Arte, please send it me. Arte 19th February 2002, 08:12 AM here there is, sheet one is completely filled, and sheet 2 is to fill in the blank. Regards Arte:thedeal: IGORTS 19th February 2002, 09:34 AM Dear Arte, thank you very much. Gracias WLN 21st February 2002, 04:58 AM Hi, In the GRR form, K2 is the constant used to calculate reproducibility, reproducibility(raw)= (5.15*people variance)/d2 For 2 appraisers, d2 is 1.41, May I know where does 1.41 come from? Thank you very much. Ryan Wilde 21st February 2002, 01:45 PM The Square root of 2 is 1.41 (1.414213562²=2) Therefore, with 3 appraisers d2 is 1.732, with 4 appraisers d2 is 2, and so on. Ryan Atul Khandekar 8th March 2002, 04:35 AM The constant d2* (Dee-Two-Star) is read from the Table called "Values for the distribution of the Average Range" given in the MSA Manual. The values of d2* for reproducibility are: For 2 appraisers : d2* = 1.41; K2 = 5.15/1.41 = 3.65 For 3 appraisers : d2* = 1.91; K2 = 5.15/1.91 = 2.70 Similarly, d2* used in repeatability calculations depends on No of trials and (No of parts time no of appraisers). So for 3 appraisers, and 10 parts we have the following d2* values: for 2 trials : d2* = 1.128; K1 = 5.15/1.16 = 4.56 for 3 trials : d2* = 1.693; K1 = 5.15/1.72 = 3.04 For R&R calculations, For 5 parts, d2* = 2.48; K3 = 5.15/2.48 = 2.08 For 10 parts, d2* = 3.18; K3 = 5.15/3.18 = 1.62 For statistical explanation of these values you will have to refer "Quality Control And Industrial Statistics" by AJ Duncan. -Atul. Arte 8th March 2002, 07:52 AM Thanks for the explanation Atul, you can find more information about in on MSA (measurement Systems Analysis) Febr. 1995 Ford Motor Comp., GM Corp and D.C, , the manual may obtained from AIAG at 810-358-3570, the values in this manual are on page 29 Regards Arte:thedeal: Atul Khandekar 8th March 2002, 08:57 AM Arte, Yes, the MSA manual has the table. MSA manual also mentions Duncan's book as reference. I use the values on faith that someone out there would have a valid statistical explanation for them - much like we 'look up' the constants A2, D3, D4... in SPC.:) -Atul. fesparza2004 18th October 2006, 07:52 PM here there is, sheet one is completely filled, and sheet 2 is to fill in the blank. Regards Arte:thedeal: Could you please send me the password to unlock the operator names cells? Thank you. Miner 18th October 2006, 08:24 PM Sheet 2 is unprotected. Sheet 1 appears to be an example only. Atul Khandekar 19th October 2006, 04:57 AM Can you please send me the password, to unlock the operator names cells?fesparza2004, welcome to the Cove. :caution: Please note that Arte's sheet was posted over 4 years ago. This has MSA 2nd edition constants. Also the sheet computes GRR as % of Tolerance only. You will have to correct the factors to match the 3rd edition. You also will have to add a few formulas if you need %TV or nDC etc. If you search the forums you should be able to find many more worksheets conforming to the current MSA standard. Dave Strouse 19th October 2006, 08:57 AM This link gives an explaination and formula to calculate d2 factors. http://www.tau.ac.il/cc/pages/docs/sas8/qc/chapc/sect9.htm Schilling, Ott, Neubauer "Process Quality Control" lists papers from Pearson (1932) as earliest reference. I do believe I was required to read those at one time. I'm sure you can imagine, it was enthralling to say the least. Wonder why I can't remember a dang thing about them. Hmmm. Maybe not so exciting stuff after all. |
|