The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Google
  Web Elsmar.com
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google.

View Full Version : Interlaboratory Comparisons Test of CMM (coordinate measuring machine)


Dave N-2007
25th November 2002, 02:46 PM
Does anyone Have a phone # or e-mail of someone I could contact to get involved in a CMM Laboratory Comparison Test.
We need to something like this for compliance to ISO 17025.

Thanks,
Dave N

Graeme
26th November 2002, 11:54 PM
Here is one possible source --

National Assocoation for Proficiency Testing, http://www.proficiency.org/

They have many different programs running, and one is identified as something for a CMM. (I'm not sure what, that's not my field - I'm an electronics person.)

Ken K
27th November 2002, 12:33 AM
I would also suggest you look on the websites of A2LA, LAB or other registars. They should have suggested references for proficiency testing.

Bill Ryan
27th November 2002, 07:25 AM
We need to something like this for compliance to ISO 17025.

Dave

First of all, welcome to the Cove!

I'm not that involved with ISO 17025 - but that is changing. Which clause are you attempting to comply with?

Bill

Dave N-2007
27th November 2002, 07:35 AM
ISO/IEC 17025 - 1999 section 5.9.b

Thanks for your response
Dave N

Bill Ryan
27th November 2002, 07:51 AM
Dave,

I don't see that as a requirement due to the last sentence in the paragraph above "a)". That being said, if your company decides you want "b)" as part of your regimen for assuring results, wouldn't you just need a "partner" CMM for comparison of measurements? (Any Cove member can jump in on that - please)

If that is so, we have a CMM and I would think my company (TS registered) would be responsive to a partnering (that way we could also add one of the "mays" to our list for compliance).

Bill

D.Scott
27th November 2002, 08:14 AM
I agree with Bill. Proficiency programs were required back when it was a fastener act requirement in the US. Once that act left the scene A2LA and others dropped the Fastener Program from their list of accreditation programs and the requirement went with it.

We still use an in-house comparison for proficiency which was left over from our A2LA days.

Dave

Dave N-2007
27th November 2002, 08:26 AM
D.scott,

I like the idea from Bill Ryan, but would like to know how you do your in-house comparisons as another avenue.

Thanks,
Dave N

JerryStem
27th November 2002, 04:42 PM
We couldn't find anyone in our field that did proficiency tests/comparisons, so I started my own with our customers.
(We are a calibration lab for coating/plating thickness measurement equip-XRF, Eddy Current, Magnetic, Beta Backscatter, etc...)

It took a little planning and work, but A2LA understood the problem and liked what I did to solve it...

Basically we act as the pivot lab for a series of Round Robin tests...

Jerry
:frust:

Ken K
30th November 2002, 12:19 AM
Dave, we just had a pre-audit for 17025. One of the requirements before out audit was a proficiency test schedule. If we could not have any proficiency testing completed before our audit, we need to give our auditor a schedule of when it would be performed.

Now, after saying that, none of the proficiency test providers could help us because of the test methods listed in our scope. Our sister lab ran into the same thing. So after much discussion, we were told we could develope our own program between our labs. So we exchanged our lab scope's and low and behold...only two test methods are shared by us.

I'm still waiting for a reply from our auditor. Seems this requirement might need to be dropped.

Marc
8th July 2006, 01:36 PM
Does anyone know what happened with respect to this proficiency requirement?

True Position
9th July 2006, 02:38 PM
Corporate at my company found these guys:

http://www.hn-proficiency.com/

I just got done with the CMM interlaboratory accreditation. Waiting to hear on the results.

Marc
10th July 2006, 09:07 AM
Let us know what happens!