The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Google
  Web Elsmar.com
*Please be aware that SOME RECENT forum threads may not yet be indexed by Google.

View Full Version : Quality plan / R&M format - Welding assemblies, hemmer assemblies, fastening systems


mibusha
15th December 1998, 07:04 PM
We design and build welding assemblies, hemmer assemblies and fastening systems. As a TE supplier we are registering to ISO 9001 TE with a pre-assessment in January,99.

We have been doing Control Plans and FMEAs (actually catching up on them with a combination of workshops and classes).

I know we have to have a quality plan and we have to design in R&M. Basically I am using pages 2-2 through 2-5 in the R&M Guidelines (SAE).

My question is: What form or format does the quality plan and/or R&M take? Do all five stages appear on a Gantt chart? Must I document, for example, LCC calculations? Or should I write the procedure (our quality plan and/or R&M)in text form and note each document as it is mentioned in the text? We do most of the TE requirements but have not done a good job of documenting them.

As you can see I could use some advice on this. Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Michael

Howard Atkins
15th December 1998, 11:27 PM
I am afraid that I do not know anything about this. I will post also at the TE forum .
Can anyone help?

Marc
19th December 1998, 12:29 PM
My experience with Quality Plans ranges from product specific plans to general design & development plans. In the ISO and QS world a 'quality plan' can be a series of systems, if you will. That is to say I don't always see a specific written 'quality plan' per se.

In QS it is your APQP system and related events. Yup - Design and Process FMEAs, control plans, flow diagrams, design reviews, verification, validation - all these together form your 'quality plan' in adduition to other things you do (eg: Quality Function Deployment, customer surveys, how nonconforming product is handled [yes - production features may be a part] etc.).

As long as you can show equivalances in your systems to the 'phases', you should be in gear.

I can't speak to the R&M issue.