The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

ISO 9001 - Snake Oil? A discussion of the validity/value of ISO 9001

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links

Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services

International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC

International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

View Poll Results: What Do YOU Believe About ISO 9001?
ASQ Member - Yes I read it. 29 26.13%
ASQ Member - Didn't read it. 17 15.32%
Not an ASQ Member 23 20.72%
Agree - It's Snake Oil, a Scam. 13 11.71%
It has Become a Scam, but is Good Business Practices 57 51.35%
Disagree - Hoyer is way off base. 5 4.50%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 111. You may not vote on this Poll because you are not Logged In.

Some Related Topic Tags
value added, iso 9001 - quality management systems
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 4.67 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 7th February 2002, 09:29 AM
Marc's Avatar

Total Posts: 26,672
Read This! ISO 9001 - Snake Oil?

In a recent issue of Quality Progress, R. W. Hoyer wrote an article titled Why Quality Gets An F. The current issue has several replies in its QP Mailbag.

The poll with this thread is Multiple Choice.

I'm curious... What do YOU think? Your comments are also welcome!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 7th February 2002, 10:44 AM
db's Avatar

Total Posts: 2,590
Question Snake oil

I am one (okay the only one so far) of the ASQ members that did not read the article. I started to, but after a few paragraphs, decided I had no interest in reading the reminder. I have worked with enough companies to discover several things. First, there are those who only want the flag, and will skirt any requirement they can. For them, it is snake oil. There are others that have taken these good business practices (I often say that much of ISO 9001 fall into the “well duh” category) and have run with them. For these companies, ISO 9001 is the oil that lubricates their business. The third group wants to do the right thing, but struggled before 9K, and still struggles. For them it is the castor oil that prevents their business from getting sicker.

I guess one person’s snake oil could be another person’s life oil. It is all a matter of perspective, and what you do with it. After all, even snake oil is great for roses!

  Post Number #3  
Old 7th February 2002, 11:28 AM
HFowler's Avatar

Total Posts: 134
I know this sounds "too simple", but I think if companies put a lot more emphasis on supplier audits, that overall quality would improve. You can sometimes better exercise your "responsibilty and authority" with suppliers than you can in your own company.

If our customers held us more accountable, more often, maybe management would be more interested in making sure that quality was being maintained.

Hank Fowler
  Post Number #4  
Old 7th February 2002, 11:53 AM
M Greenaway's Avatar
M Greenaway

Total Posts: 1,657

This is where your customer focus, communication and feedback in ISO9001:2000 should come in very helpful.

Its possible that in the past the companies perception of what the quality issues are was not what the customer perceived. This is one of the strengths of the intent of the new standard.
  Post Number #5  
Old 7th February 2002, 12:34 PM
Aaron Lupo's Avatar
Aaron Lupo

Total Posts: 908
I have to agree with Hank. The only time and I mean the only time anything gets attention around here is when our customers audit us. Sad but true.
  Post Number #6  
Old 7th February 2002, 04:14 PM
Aaron Lupo's Avatar
Aaron Lupo

Total Posts: 908
Hey Carl we agreed on something how about that! Just kidding!

Actually I am experiencing that problem now. I am at a complete loss for a solution, I have suggested many they have implented none. I hate hearing "I don't have time" as an excuse or "operator was multi-tasking" they are the worst excuses in the world. I don't think anyone really has time but you know something I certainly find a way to get my work done and last I checked I have the same 24 hours in a day as they do. I can give them the ideas and the solutions but it is up to them to implement them.
  Post Number #7  
Old 7th February 2002, 05:13 PM
db's Avatar

Total Posts: 2,590
Exclamation Agree with Carl Day

I must agree with Carl as well. Although, we must not mix point 2 and point 3. We can easily show the perception of reducing PPM through manipulating information, when in fact nothing has changed. It all boils down to how “real” is management’s commitment
  Post Number #8  
Old 9th February 2002, 05:27 AM
Atul Khandekar's Avatar
Atul Khandekar

Total Posts: 1,455
I am not an ASQ member myself ( a colleague in my company is) but I have read the article. I think ISO 9k2k has the potential to become a good business practice if followed in the right spirit and focus. As things stand today ( I am not in the US, so my opinion may not hold good for the US scenario), it has come to be nothing but scam. Bert Gunter's comments referenced in Hoyer's article explain why..

I really appreciated Kevin Mader's pertinent observations in his reply 'Quality has taken a backseat to profits' in QP mailbag December 2001 issue.

Last edited by Atul Khandekar; 9th February 2002 at 05:29 AM.

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > >


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 - Changes Discussion Marc ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13 29th March 2018 04:49 PM
Validity of ISO 9001:2000 Certificates - How to handle supplier ISO 9001 certificates ermoth ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4 10th February 2015 03:33 PM
ISO 9001 Quality Manual Validity Period alonFAI ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8 18th November 2013 08:50 PM
Validity of ISO 9001 Certification arin_23 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6 9th June 2009 10:21 AM
ISO 9001:2000 Certificate - How to have a 3 year validity instead of 1? cmfugen ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15 8th September 2008 05:19 AM

The time now is 03:08 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.

Misc. Internal Links

NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"