The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Absolute to Relative Uncertainty - Expressing the U as a percent of the reading

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links


Links Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in the quest for knowledge and support:

Jennifer Kirley's
Conway Business Services


Howard's
International Quality Services


Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum


Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


Ajit Basrur
Claritas Consulting, LLC



International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

AIAG - Automotive Industry Action Group

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Organization for Standardization - ISO Standards and Information

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Some Related Topic Tags
measurement uncertainty (mu), uncertainty budget (measurement)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 10th December 2010, 12:05 AM
edge540

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Question Absolute to Relative Uncertainty - Expressing the U as a percent of the reading

I am working on my uncertainty budget for a 1m long calibration device for testing machine crosshead travel and long stroke extensometers. Basically I want to express the U as a percent of reading. So far everything is absolute in um... so I'm a bit stuck.

I have had the instrument calibrated and they give a +/- 5um uncertainty to the device.
Resolution is 1um.

I calculated through a repeatability study appx 15um for the std dev. and then introduced a cosine error and came up with appx 23um for that std. dev.

In the end I calculate about a 27um Uncertainty... but I would rather express it as a % of reading.
I'm not too clear on how to do that though.

If this question has been asked (and it is probably buried here somewhere) I apologize in advance.

Any help is appreciated.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 10th December 2010, 04:56 AM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor

 
 
Total Posts: 15,334
Re: Absolute to Relative Uncertainty - Expressing the U as a percent of the reading

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by edge540 View Post

I am working on my uncertainty budget for a 1m long calibration device for testing machine crosshead travel and long stroke extensometers. Basically I want to express the U as a percent of reading. So far everything is absolute in um... so I'm a bit stuck.

I have had the instrument calibrated and they give a +/- 5um uncertainty to the device.
Resolution is 1um.

I calculated through a repeatability study appx 15um for the std dev. and then introduced a cosine error and came up with appx 23um for that std. dev.

In the end I calculate about a 27um Uncertainty... but I would rather express it as a % of reading.
I'm not too clear on how to do that though.

If this question has been asked (and it is probably buried here somewhere) I apologize in advance.

Any help is appreciated.
Any calibration/uncertainty experts who can help?

Thank you!

Stijloor.
  Post Number #3  
Old 10th December 2010, 08:23 AM
Mike Boothe

 
 
Total Posts: 16
Re: Absolute to Relative Uncertainty - Expressing the U as a percent of the reading

Convert each item in your uncertainty budget to % of reading then your result will be in % of reading.
Thanks to Mike Boothe for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #4  
Old 10th December 2010, 11:30 AM
edge540

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Re: Absolute to Relative Uncertainty - Expressing the U as a percent of the reading

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Mike Boothe View Post

Convert each item in your uncertainty budget to % of reading then your result will be in % of reading.
Yes, I was thinking about it last night and decided to do that.

I have 10 set points and ten readings each but its in excel now so it should be easy to take care of that.

Should I then combine all to use in my Type A uncertainties or should I take each one individually in there?

Once in % I suppose I only need to take the Std Dev of all and use one Type A.

What about resolution? it is abs. 0.001mm
And the calibration report UnC is 0.005mm (the range will be 50mm to 999mm)
Should I use the 50mm point for those (since they are the worst case so to speak)

Resolution is then 0.002% and the Cal Cert Unc is then 0.01% (k=2)

Does that make sense? (that is the one question that I remember from my Uncertainty training course back about 10 years ago,,, problem is that some of this makes sense but I'm not so sure I know if that is me wanting for it to make sense or if it really does)
  Post Number #5  
Old 10th December 2010, 03:11 PM
dv8shane

 
 
Total Posts: 215
Re: Absolute to Relative Uncertainty - Expressing the U as a percent of the reading

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by edge540 View Post

What about resolution? it is abs. 0.001mm
And the calibration report UnC is 0.005mm (the range will be 50mm to 999mm)
Should I use the 50mm point for those (since they are the worst case so to speak)

Resolution is then 0.002% and the Cal Cert Unc is then 0.01% (k=2)
Using the worst case is in my opinion OK but not preferred, as the customer will inherit your transfer uncertainty. Therefore at the points where your uncertainty is much better you are providing a lesser service to them.

I think the resolution contribution is lower than stated as the distribution of resolution is determined at a 100% level of confidence by dividing by root 12.
Question Do you also include degrees of freedom in your budgets?

Last edited by dv8shane; 10th December 2010 at 03:25 PM.
  Post Number #6  
Old 10th December 2010, 03:19 PM
edge540

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Re: Absolute to Relative Uncertainty - Expressing the U as a percent of the reading

I do field service and am pretty conservative with my budgets. In this case, the parameter need not be super critical so I would rather take a higher uncertainty as I know that there will be setup issues and other contributors in reality once this is in service.

In I do use DOF in my calculations (normally using the Unc 3.2 calculator).
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > > >

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Emoticons are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Understanding the absolute uncertainty specification for a Fluke 5500A NickF Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 3 6th April 2015 10:05 AM
Uncertainty Budget with a mixture of kg and % Reading EILBC Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 4 9th November 2013 11:59 AM
How to calculate Relative Uncertainty - Measurements are in different units amanbhai Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 4 12th November 2010 03:19 AM
UUT resolution and reporting uncertainty for each reading CodyK Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 2 27th March 2009 06:24 PM
Uncertainty calculations for RH (Relative Humidity) sensors neoth Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 5 9th February 2009 11:03 PM



The time now is 04:02 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



Misc. Internal Links


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"