The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > FMEA and Control Plans
Forum Username


Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links







Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Sponsored Links
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's
International Quality Services

Atul's
Symphony Technologies

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting

Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26th June 2002, 09:31 AM
Andrews Andrews is offline
Involved - Posts

 
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chennai - India
Age: 36
 
Posts: 298
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 77
Karma: 53
Andrews has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question FMEA 3rd edition - FMEA is required only for high risk operations?

FMEA 2nd edition - under the "Development of process FMEA" it has been stated that a process FMEA should begin with a flowchart/resk assessment of the general process and in addition Appendix C says FMEA is required only for high risk operation but this statement has been removed from the third edition FMEA. Therefore are we required to look at the existing FMEA and conduct FMEA for medium and low risk operations.
  #2  
Old 26th June 2002, 03:14 PM
M Greenaway's Avatar
M Greenaway M Greenaway is offline
Courtesy Access

 
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
 
Posts: 1,652
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 72 Times in 50 Posts
Karma Power: 213
Karma: 839
M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
I thought FMEA was conducted on the product design and then on the process design, didnt think it went down to seperate FMEA's for seperate operations, unless by operations we mean processes.

Also how would one determine the risk without conducting an FMEA in the first place ??

Yours

MG

Confused
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 29th June 2002, 04:15 AM
Andrews Andrews is offline
Involved - Posts

 
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chennai - India
Age: 36
 
Posts: 298
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 77
Karma: 53
Andrews has less than 100 Karma points so far.
I meant processes in the above query? My question was whether FMEA has to be done for all processes required for the product or only the high risk processes like palting , heat treatment that have no. of failures?
  #4  
Old 5th July 2002, 02:34 PM
Obi-Wan Obi-Wan is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

 
Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: Michigan, USA
 
Posts: 3
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 46
Karma: 10
Obi-Wan has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Having spoken with one of the contributors to SAE J1739 (the parent to Third edition), the "high risk" reference was removed because it was so subjective. The intent is that there is an FMEA for each process/operation. For those that are very generic (receiving operations or packaging might be an examples) "generic" FMEAs can be referenced, reviewed for the new product and revised as required as a time/effort saver.
  #5  
Old 5th July 2002, 04:50 PM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
 
Posts: n/a
OBI,

Were close but I differ in that a FMEA is a living document of the entire process to provide a part/product to the customer.

The FMEA starts with ordering and receiving raw material, processing, and final shipment of that product. I see no need for seperate FMEA's for each individual step in the process. I guess that would be to me just more of a document control aspect.
  #6  
Old 24th March 2006, 10:20 AM
brutas brutas is offline
Involved - Posts

 
Registration Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Age: 37
 
Posts: 68
Thanks Given to Others: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 42
Karma: 35
brutas has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via ICQ to brutas
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Andrews

FMEA 2nd edition - under the "Development of process FMEA" it has been stated that a process FMEA should begin with a flowchart/resk assessment of the general process and in addition Appendix C says FMEA is required only for high risk operation but this statement has been removed from the third edition FMEA. Therefore are we required to look at the existing FMEA and conduct FMEA for medium and low risk operations.
I don't know for which second edition the question is about (and the posting is too old), but there is a JEDEC publication Potential Failure Mode and Effects
Analysis (FMEA):
http://www.jedec.org/download/search/jep131a.pdf

In the previous revision (JEP131, February 1998) flowchart/risk assessment of the process steps was recommended and FMEA was required only for high risk operations.
In the new revision this requirement was removed and I think this is right decision - risk assessment cannot be made before to make the FMEA.

What is your oppinion? One of our suppliers and one of our customers continues to make risk assessments of the process steps before FMEA form to be filled in. And only the operations with "Higher risks" are included in the FMEA...
  #7  
Old 24th March 2006, 11:14 AM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne Jim Wynne is online now
Cross Forum Moderator

 
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
 
Posts: 13,387
Thanks Given to Others: 1,805
Thanked 5,400 Times in 3,458 Posts
Blog Entries: 2
Karma Power: 1451
Karma: 39444
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by brutas

I don't know for which second edition the question is about (and the posting is too old), but there is a JEDEC publication Potential Failure Mode and Effects
Analysis (FMEA):
http://www.jedec.org/download/search/jep131a.pdf

In the previous revision (JEP131, February 1998) flowchart/risk assessment of the process steps was recommended and FMEA was required only for high risk operations.
In the new revision this requirement was removed and I think this is right decision - risk assessment cannot be made before to make the FMEA.

What is your oppinion? One of our suppliers and one of our customers continues to make risk assessments of the process steps before FMEA form to be filled in. And only the operations with "Higher risks" are included in the FMEA...
Don't confuse the process with the output. FMEA is not a document, it's a process, and the document is the output of the process. So when "risk assessments" such as those you refer to are being done, that is FMEA, and the ensuing decision involves only which aspects get documented.
__________________
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face (Mike Tyson)
  #8  
Old 24th March 2006, 01:20 PM
brutas brutas is offline
Involved - Posts

 
Registration Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Age: 37
 
Posts: 68
Thanks Given to Others: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 42
Karma: 35
brutas has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via ICQ to brutas
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Jim Wynne

Don't confuse the process with the output. FMEA is not a document, it's a process, and the document is the output of the process. So when "risk assessments" such as those you refer to are being done, that is FMEA, and the ensuing decision involves only which aspects get documented.
My question is:
Why this risk assessment was removed in the JEDEC FMEA publication last edition? Is it because it was realized that is not relevant and makes non sense?

And I am sure that our supplier and our customer do NOT use the FMEA process for this risk assessment. They just make (like the previous Jedec version recommends) list of all process steps and for every step they mark "low" "medium" and "high risk" (I don't know how they decide for this) and only the items marked with "high risk" are considered further in the FMEA process...
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > FMEA and Control Plans

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
FMEA 4th Edition Blank P and D FMEA sheets in Excel .xls spreadsheets qualityboi FMEA and Control Plans 37 9th May 2013 02:18 AM
FMEA Evaluation of "User Risk" - Wording FMEA 3rd party advisors jtavares ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3 7th April 2010 05:32 AM
Design FMEA Detection Scoring - FMEA 3rd edition manual KWB64 FMEA and Control Plans 7 5th March 2010 01:12 PM
FMEA 3rd edition vs 4th edition - What are the main changes? Gilberto FMEA and Control Plans 2 9th March 2009 07:27 PM
PFMEA (Process FMEA) issue about lower RPN - AIAG 3rd edition page 55 LI Yan FMEA and Control Plans 13 23rd June 2007 06:55 AM



The time now is 11:11 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272