Is SPC (Statistical Process Control) useful?

[Ashwani]

Yes It Is A Great Tool But Only If Used For The Long Run. It Can Infact Bring Some Degradations As Well If The Results You Expect From A Shorter Period.

[Tom Slack]

That is a great question!

SPC is useful for process optimization (Design of Experiments). After going through the SPC steps, the process is characterized well enough to set parameters and have them stick. SPC simplifies DOE randomization (long story).

I would encourage any reader that has a solid SPC program to cash in their chips and use DOE.

I have found that process engineers use SPC. They call it calculating "deadband".

Hope this helps,

Tom

[Effocus]

Thanks first as this topics I tried to find since long time ago!
However I'm quite doubt of the balance for:
1. The time and expenses, that those manufacturing companies has spent for the training of SPC, data collection and made their employee correctly understand how to use the SPC - control chart ... then use the SPC with
2. The actual benefit they got.
As a TS 16949 auditor and from most of those companies I visited - the SPC actually bring to them "nothing" except some demonstration chart to the auditor! No actual process variation reduction, no special cause found for the correction! - In aonther words, without those control charts, their company still doing OK!

As you know that the condition for apply the control charts are quite specific and not easy to understand for applying, so that is the reasons now, most of the company having not-correctly apply the SPC - but they still run and operate! That is why we can re-consider the contribution of SPC. In my opinion, it take more expense than brought to the business!

[bobdoering]

In Reply to Parent Post by Effocus

As a TS 16949 auditor and from most of those companies I visited - the SPC actually bring to them "nothing" except some demonstration chart to the auditor!

Yes, that is one of the down sides of doing SPC to satisfy an auditor or a customer. Neither of them know your process, so it is unlikely that they are going to accurately demand SPC to be applied for those characteristics that are actually going to control the process. Nor does doing SPC to satisfy an auditor or customer encourage deep enough understanding to actually use it correctly. Generally, people do not understand it, hear horror stories like this, and do a shallow implementation to keep auditors and customers at bay. I agree, that will yield an abject waste of time and money.

But, that does not negate its value if actually applied correctly.

In Reply to Parent Post by Effocus

In other words, without those control charts, their company still doing OK!

Well, they probably would do "OK" without the vast overhead of meeting international quality standards, also. If "OK" is good enough, then let's just scrap all of it for an international Quality Level TCE.

[JoeDM]

In Reply to Parent Post by minudil2000

as quality engineere, could you please tell me whether statistical process control is useful or not?

I think SPC is one of the easiest and most useful statistical tools. It's been around for a long time. I studied it 40+ years ago. Amazingly, when I got into industry, it seemed that nobody was using it.

I have implemented it everywhere there is any volume production. What I like is that you get process control and information about the product / process. With statistical sampling you get a pass / fail and no real data.

It's true that some companies don't use the data being generated, but that's a management problem not an SPC problem.

[Effocus]

I do not think SPC is the easiest tool! For you may be but just image for the production floor, where they have to face with many other thing during his working day. And I think, the tool is quite difficult in the applying conditions for each chart (that in many real case are not "practicable")

As you can see in the practice, why the tool is "usefull" but very little application, and the value-added process is even less? In posting this, I do not intend to say the control chart is not correct, but I think the current way now of applying the control chart is too expensive meanwhile the value its brought is too little. So, as SPC experts - we might think of some more efficient tool, that are statistical based but applicable to daily production fields.

May be I'm not experience enough, but could you please to share with me some real example, when the production can use the control charts for the quality / productivity improvement and got actual benefit in long run (said at least 1 - 2 years)

[Steve Prevette]

Effocus, thanks for the frank comments. Several discussions are occurring on the Cove about usefullness of SPC, and at least I seem to have rattled some cages about encouraging folks to use SPC. I have several papers here and at the EFCOG website about use of SPC, and case studies. One is available at http://www.efcog.org/wg/ca/events/sp...Indicators.pdf

[Effocus]

Thanks but I need some time for reading your presentation. It seams that you use the I-MR chart and can you give some example for Xbar-R chart?