The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > National and International Business Standards > FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) > Medical Devices (21 CFR part 820)


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th November 2009, 08:00 PM
aoldendo aoldendo is offline
Getting Involved (6 to 9 Posts)

Registration Date: Jul 2008
 
Posts: 7
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 6
Karma: 10
aoldendo has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! When to issue a Class II Device Recall (failure not harmful nor a safety issue)

Hi all:

This is my first post on Elsmar Cove, but I have been lurking for many months and have greatly benefited from the discussions here. I look forward to your opinions on the following matter..

My company produces a Class II device. We have begun to notice a failure in a key component of our device. However, this failure could never be harmful to the patient or become a safety issue. There's no increased risk to the patient or physician. Basically, it's a matter of effectiveness which necessitates the customer sending in the unit for service/repair.

We have addressed this by changing the design of the component. We have an ECN going on the changes with production controls in place to make the updated component.

We are going to analyze our data of the last few years and try to find out if the component failures are happening at less than a year or if the components are lasting longer than a year. Our warranties on the device are usually for a year or two years.

In your opinion, are we roaming into territory where a device recall w/ removal is necessary or should we simply send out an advisory notice to all customers regarding this component issue? Should our procedures have a threshold of x% failures which necessitate a mandatory recall? Is this all a moot point since the failure here does not constitute any risk to the user and patient?

Lastly, do you believe our current actions would satisfy the FDA? If not, what more can/should we do?

If you made it through all of that verbiage, thanks for your time and thoughtfulness.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 5th November 2009, 03:04 AM
MIREGMGR MIREGMGR is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Aug 2008
Location: SE Michigan, USA
 
Posts: 989
Thanks Given to Others: 236
Thanked 477 Times in 335 Posts
Karma Power: 176
Karma: 7567
MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.MIREGMGR is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: When to issue a Class II Device Recall (failure not harmful nor a safety issue)

Presumably you've already reviewed the FDA guidance on this. You may have a Correction situation. In any case, you should write up a memo-to-file, explaining the situation and why you think it's X and not Y. You should prepare an addendum to your risk management file, covering why the situation doesn't constitute an increased safety risk to patients or clinical personnel.

Note that in some instances, a device-loss-of-effectiveness situation can constitute an increased risk to the patient, if clinical personnel may be using your device in a context where its failure to perform as expected, or at all, might result in ineffective or inadequate patient care.

As to what further to do, the FDA has a number of Regional, District and Field offices. Go to the CDRH webpage, and do a search on FDA and your nearest major city name. Or, call DSMICA. What you want is the phone number of the Medical Device Recall Coordinator that covers your location. Call them up and have a discussion. We've done so a couple of times, with uniformly useful and informative results.
Reply With Quote
Thank You to MIREGMGR for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 5th November 2009, 10:55 AM
aoldendo aoldendo is offline
Getting Involved (6 to 9 Posts)

Registration Date: Jul 2008
 
Posts: 7
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 6
Karma: 10
aoldendo has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: When to issue a Class II Device Recall (failure not harmful nor a safety issue)

"Note that in some instances, a device-loss-of-effectiveness situation can constitute an increased risk to the patient, if clinical personnel may be using your device in a context where its failure to perform as expected, or at all, might result in ineffective or inadequate patient care."

This is certainly our greatest concern at the moment.

After we have performed our analysis of the situation, I will definitely look into calling the nearest coordinator or FDA office for their take on the situation.

Thanks again MIREGMGR!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > National and International Business Standards > FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) > Medical Devices (21 CFR part 820)

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Safety issue help - Request a Corrective Action (CA) for Safety Incident? crendfrey Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 9 23rd February 2006 09:56 PM
Request for Formal CA - To Issue or Not to Issue CarolX Nonconformance and Corrective Action 15 30th July 2003 09:48 AM
ISO Urgent Release Issue - Positive Recall DonkeyKong ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 3 28th January 2002 03:49 AM
Re-Issue of Documents - Requirement to re-issue a document after so many revisions? jonnycad Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2 4th September 2001 09:42 PM



The time now is 05:25 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts