The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard
Forum Username


Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links







Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Sponsored Links
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's
International Quality Services

Atul's
Symphony Technologies

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting

Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


Related Topic Tags
control plans, document content & structure, document control, operator instructions, documents and documentation (general)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #9  
Old 18th March 2011, 04:09 AM
Stubod Stubod is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Nov 2010
 
Posts: 14
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 12
Karma: 15
Stubod has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Re: Control Plan Details vs. Operator Instruction Sheets - Document Contents

I am aware that control plans and FMEA's can be considered as intellectual property rights of the supplier using them. It is therefore not unreasonable for the supplier to stop this info going off site. We regularly use the customer to review these on site only and then they sign a sheet to say they have been reviewed....these then get added to the PPAP files....

Last edited by Stijloor; 18th March 2011 at 04:20 AM. Reason: Typos

Sponsored Links
  #10  
Old 18th March 2011, 09:47 AM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne Jim Wynne is online now
Cross Forum Moderator

 
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
 
Posts: 13,334
Thanks Given to Others: 1,779
Thanked 5,356 Times in 3,431 Posts
Blog Entries: 2
Karma Power: 1445
Karma: 39224
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: Control Plan Details vs. Operator Instruction Sheets - Document Contents

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Stubod View Post

I am aware that control plans and FMEA's can be considered as intellectual property rights of the supplier using them. It is therefore not unreasonable for the supplier to stop this info going off site. We regularly use the customer to review these on site only and then they sign a sheet to say they have been reviewed....these then get added to the PPAP files....
Although I'm familiar with suppliers claiming proprietary rights for PFMEAs, I've never personally heard of one who wouldn't share a control plan. I've always considered this odd because a control plan is more likely to contain sensitive information. In any event, unless the withholding of PPAP information was agreed to contractually, the obliged to divulge control methods in the PPAP.

In the present case, it's a matter of discussion and negotiation between the OP's company and its supplier. Customers usually have the upper hand in these things, but not always and there are times when some form of compromise is necessary.
__________________
We aim to please. You aim too, please.
Sponsored Links

Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
APQP Timing Plan Details and APQP Package Contents (e.g.: floor plan) - Batch Mfg. mechhari22 APQP and PPAP 5 17th January 2010 01:29 AM
Control of MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheets) - Document Control required? qalsang ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 8 8th May 2009 02:22 PM
Gutting the Control Plan of all details and and getting it accepted by the big 3 Caster FMEA and Control Plans 11 17th June 2008 08:08 AM
Control Plan - Does not replace information in detailed operator instruction KayJay FMEA and Control Plans 1 25th June 2001 10:04 AM
Pre-Launch Control Plan Contents - What should I include? VALERIE548 FMEA and Control Plans 4 9th August 1999 09:50 AM



The time now is 09:15 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272