Elsmar Cove Forum Header Graphic The Elsmar Cove Wiki Sitemap More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar Cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
NQA-USA
NQA-USA
Miner's MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Blog 
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis > Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools / Solutions > Using Minitab Software
Forum Username

Wooden Line

Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a tube

Search the Elsmar Cove
Search Elsmar
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality

Related Topic Tags
measurement (general)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 23rd April 2012, 06:09 PM
Brad Gover

 
 
Total Posts: 37
Please Help! Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a tube

Hi All, I have a problem in calculating the thickness of a coating material inside a tube. The tubes inside diameter is measured before and after coating. The coating thickness is calculated by substracting the diameters and dividing by two to get the thickness of the coated material. The before coat diameter is 0.3949". The after coat diameter is 0.3893". The Total Gage R&R standard deviation is 0.000127". I need to calculate the coating thickness value and its associated error.

I am thinking the thickness without error = (0.3949 - 0.3893)/2 = 0.0028"
The associated error from the resulting calculation would be

Error = [5.15 * (0.0001272 + 0.000127 2).5]/2 = 0.000462
I would record the thickness as 0.0028 0.000462?

I saw some examples where they standard deviation was used in place of the 5.15 multiplier value i.e., 0.0028 0.00018. I would think this would only capture some 66% of the uncertainty.
P.S. I used Big 3 MSA value of 5.15 instead of 6
Thanks, Brad






Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 24th April 2012, 04:25 AM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor

 
 
Total Posts: 14,703
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

A Quick Bump!

Can someone help Brad?

Thank you very much!!

Stijloor.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 25th April 2012, 08:46 AM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor

 
 
Total Posts: 14,703
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

Again A Quick Bump!

Can someone help?

Thank you very much!!

Stijloor.
  Post Number #4  
Old 25th April 2012, 11:26 AM
AdamP's Avatar
AdamP

 
 
Total Posts: 97
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by [COLOR=black

I need to calculate the coating thickness value and its associated error.[/COLOR]

I am thinking the thickness without error = (0.3949 - 0.3893)/2 = 0.0028"
The associated error from the resulting calculation would be
Error = [5.15 * (0.0001272 + 0.000127 2).5]/2 = 0.000462
I would record the thickness as 0.0028 0.000462?

HI - A couple of questions. If you're stating the margin of error around the average coating thickness I'm not sure why you've included the GRR StDEV twice. Also, the CI formula (margin of error) has us taking the Z value (here 5.15 or 6) * StDEv/SQRT of sample size - I don't see the SQRT of n in your calculation - CAn you share the actual formula you're using to express the margin of error?

Also - yeah folks have moved to using 6 rather than 5.15 as it shows a confidence level of 99.73 rather than 99.

Cheers,

Adam
  Post Number #5  
Old 25th April 2012, 12:52 PM
Brad Gover

 
 
Total Posts: 37
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

Well, I am thinking the reason I am using the standard deviation twice is we measure the ID twice and calculate the difference between the two measurements to get the thickness of the coating. i.e.,
Machined ID = 0.3955"
Coated ID = 0.3925"
Coating thickness = (Machined ID - Coating ID)/2 = (0.3955" - 0.3925")/2 = 0.003".
Each measurement is made by the same instrument and each individual measurement would induce error. In this case we made two measurements to get the coating thickness. (If I only made one measurement I think I would only use the error Std Dev once.) The first measurement error is compounded with the second measurement error when both are used in a calculation. (See attachment if I am lucky enough to have it uploaded for an explanation.) The standard deviation comes from using Minitab's Gage RR via a two factor cross random ANOVA array. We performed this using three operators and three trials with 10 parts. Thanks for the help!
Brad
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: pdf Propagation of Errors.pdf (326.8 KB, 11 views)
  Post Number #6  
Old 30th April 2012, 01:03 PM
Allattar

 
 
Total Posts: 234
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

In propagating errors you add variances, not standard deviations.

You would square both standard deviations, and then add them. Then square root to get the standard deviation of the system. In which case your error, if assuming the same standard deviation on measurements before and after becomes Std Dev * root 2.

The problem can be broken down into

Difference + Error(overall) = (Before + error(Measure) - (After + error(measure)

but my heads to frazzled today to work it further than that
Thank You to Allattar for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 30th April 2012, 01:28 PM
Bev D's Avatar
Bev D

 
 
Total Posts: 3,009
Re: Propagation of Errors in Calculations - Thickness of a coating material inside a

Allatar is on the right track. unfortunately AIAG has the wrong formulas for truly extracting measurement error from total observed variation. As Allater said - you do not use standard deviations you use variances.

But befroe commenting furhter, I need to ask why you want to know the measurement error? what will you do with the info? how will you use it?
the answers will provide us wiht the means for giving you a useful answer.

for example, if you aren't doing anything with the data, but are simply reporting it to your customer, then we woudl give one answer. If you were going to use it to guardband yoru measurements or develop a better measurement sytem, we would give a very different answer...
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis > Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools / Solutions > Using Minitab Software

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
PCBA (Printed Circuit Board Assembly) Conformal Coating Material and Thickness? Nicco Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 9 11th December 2011 09:38 PM
ISO 2081 - Interpreting Coating Thickness ARM129 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 3 17th February 2011 07:28 AM
Blender and Coating Equipment Quantity Calculations raji_rajesh Manufacturing and Related Processes 3 17th October 2010 05:45 AM
How to choose samples for Gage R&R - Micrometer to check tube thickness RGohil Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6 14th February 2006 12:33 PM
DOE (Design of Experiments) for Powder Coating Thickness Toefuzz - 2006 Six Sigma 9 10th November 2005 02:37 PM



The time now is 10:53 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".