The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to ProblemsElsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Quality Management Systems > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Who "owns" Sub-Processes?


Search the Elsmar Cove
Search Elsmar
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links


Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality

Related Topic Tags
processes (general), responsibilities
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 5th May 2012, 04:49 PM
QAMTY

 
 
Total Posts: 275
Question Who "owns" Sub-Processes?

Hi all

Regarding the Process owner.

While in the developing procedures some doubts arose.
For example: in the Inspection Process (main process or core process) with its respective owner.
Under this process there are some sub-processes (or activities named by others) e.g. Labeling and shipping, Final Inspection, etc.

Do these sub-processes managed by other people, should be owned by them or by the owner of the main process?

What it is correct?

Thanks

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 5th May 2012, 05:18 PM
Jennifer Kirley's Avatar
Jennifer Kirley

 
 
Total Posts: 5,709
Re: Who "owns" Sub-Processes?

Good day QAMTY,

I do not know the size or dynamics of your organization, so it is difficult to answer your question.

I want to instead encourage you to decide this among yourselves. There is no one right answer. If you have a QA Manager/Engineer/Supervisor in charge of the overall process, for example but you have a gifted Quality Inspector, there is no reason that Quality Inspector cannot have control over the inspection process. All that's required is definition, implementation and effectiveness. That is, the procedures/SOPs etc have a defined owner (whoever it is), that person knows and feels capable and supported to control that sub-process, and the organization bears that out by supporting that individual in his or her proper attempts to maintain effective execution.

Does this make sense?
Thanks to Jennifer Kirley for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 5th May 2012, 06:00 PM
QAMTY

 
 
Total Posts: 275
Re: Who "owns" Sub-Processes?

Thanks Jennifer

Well my company is 100 people, my case is:
I have a Manager who is in charge of the Inspection process, with a lot of experience to manage the department.
Under him for Shipping, Final inspection,etc. he has other very capable guys
doing their jobs.

I know the manager has the overall responsibility but the other guys also have responsibility.
1-For not overlapping responsibilities I think should assign to each the proper responsibility

2- Can I call them owners as well?

Thanks
  Post Number #4  
Old 5th May 2012, 10:15 PM
somashekar's Avatar
somashekar

 
 
Total Posts: 4,988
Re: Who "owns" Sub-Processes?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by QAMTY View Post

Thanks Jennifer

Well my company is 100 people, my case is:
I have a Manager who is in charge of the Inspection process, with a lot of experience to manage the department.
Under him for Shipping, Final inspection,etc. he has other very capable guys
doing their jobs.

I know the manager has the overall responsibility but the other guys also have responsibility.
1-For not overlapping responsibilities I think should assign to each the proper responsibility

2- Can I call them owners as well?

Thanks
Any process owner (Core process / Support process / Sub-process) needs to have certain leadership and managerial qualities so as to own his work to execute with authority and responsibility and within the stipulated time., and interact with peers to meet the organization requirements. He must have the big picture in clarity and know how to do his part of the picture.
Without these qualities one pretty much waits for orders or directions to perform and tagging them as owners of a process does no great either to the person or the organization.
So you have to judge and decide whom you will designate process owner and let them own and perform, with management constantly reviewing and providing resources and directions.
So my response is ... Does someone have the leadership and managerial qualities and abilities to be designated as process owner ?
How many processes then can he own and perform ?
Thanks to somashekar for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #5  
Old 7th May 2012, 03:00 AM
qusys

 
 
Total Posts: 2,221
Re: Who "owns" Sub-Processes?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by QAMTY View Post

Thanks Jennifer

Well my company is 100 people, my case is:
I have a Manager who is in charge of the Inspection process, with a lot of experience to manage the department.
Under him for Shipping, Final inspection,etc. he has other very capable guys
doing their jobs.

I know the manager has the overall responsibility but the other guys also have responsibility.
1-For not overlapping responsibilities I think should assign to each the proper responsibility

2- Can I call them owners as well?

Thanks
Some literature about process mapping indicates process owner as well as stewards of the process. Besides there are also performers roles.
I think it is a question of responsibility and accountability, however the decision could be based upon the criticality of the processes and their largeness.
Thanks to qusys for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 7th May 2012, 08:24 AM
andygr's Avatar
andygr

 
 
Total Posts: 435
Re: Who "owns" Sub-Processes?

How about this for a way to identify the "owner".
Under the process base method there should be metrics that track the performance of the process. In most orginizations there are performance reviews based on some type of metric(s). Who is geting their performance review based on the subprocess metrics? This would be a front runner in my view for the process owner since they have a vested intrest in the subprocess and its preformance.
Thanks to andygr for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Quality Management Systems > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
QbD Approach - What are the "New Processes" to be "Defined / Introduced" v9991 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6 16th October 2012 08:14 PM
Turtle Diagrams - Difference between "Linked Processes" and "Support Processes" qusys ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5 18th July 2012 08:53 AM
"Testing procedure: TMP", "WMT", "SMT" and "RMT" - IEC 60601-1 TRF nomenclature Jaydub IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3 13th June 2012 11:47 AM
Various Processes - "Management", "planning" & "feedback", oh my! irish01 Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5 22nd January 2009 08:33 AM
"Outsourcing processes" and ISO 9001 Clause 1.2 "Application" eee ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 2 20th November 2000 09:56 AM



The time now is 09:23 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".