The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.
Forum Username


Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links







Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Sponsored Links
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's
International Quality Services

Atul's
Symphony Technologies

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting

Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


Related Topic Tags
ppap (production part approval process), process capability, cpk (related to process capability)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20th January 2012, 12:33 AM
mahesh jadhav mahesh jadhav is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

 
Registration Date: May 2010
Location: India
 
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 13
Karma: 10
mahesh jadhav has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?

hello sir,
can you please tell me Cpk should more than 1.33 or 1.67 and it is accroding to any standerd? how standerd deviation & Pp Ppk calculated.

Last edited by harry; 20th January 2012 at 01:01 AM. Reason: Thread moved from: SPC and Injection Moulding

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 20th January 2012, 01:05 AM
Howard Atkins's Avatar
Howard Atkins Howard Atkins is offline
Forum Administrator

 
Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
 
Posts: 2,867
Thanks Given to Others: 142
Thanked 917 Times in 476 Posts
Blog Entries: 8
Karma Power: 400
Karma: 7494
Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Howard Atkins
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by mahesh jadhav View Post

hello sir,
can you please tell me Cpk should more than 1.33 or 1.67 and it is accroding to any standerd? how standerd deviation & Pp Ppk calculated.
There are various requirements for Cpk and Ppk.
Thee are specific requirements in the AIAG PPAP book but essentially the requirements are based on those of the customer.
These are minimum values

The calculation can be found b searching the forums
__________________
Lean starts with your documentation
Save trees
Thanks to Howard Atkins for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 20th January 2012, 05:43 AM
qusys qusys is offline
Appreciated Information Resource

 
Registration Date: Mar 2008
 
Posts: 2,043
Thanks Given to Others: 216
Thanked 645 Times in 571 Posts
Karma Power: 232
Karma: 3929
qusys is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
qusys is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.qusys is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.qusys is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.qusys is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.qusys is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.qusys is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.qusys is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.qusys is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by mahesh jadhav View Post

hello sir,
can you please tell me Cpk should more than 1.33 or 1.67 and it is accroding to any standerd? how standerd deviation & Pp Ppk calculated.
Automotive customers usually ask for Cpk major than 1.67. If you pursue ISO TS , AIAG blue books guidelines are usually seen as reference for process capability after input of the customers.
  #4  
Old 20th January 2012, 07:03 AM
mahesh jadhav mahesh jadhav is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

 
Registration Date: May 2010
Location: India
 
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 13
Karma: 10
mahesh jadhav has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?

thanks.....
  #5  
Old 20th January 2012, 08:25 AM
bobdoering's Avatar
bobdoering bobdoering is offline
Stop X-bar/R Madness

 
Registration Date: May 2002
Location: LaGrange, OH
 
Posts: 3,817
Thanks Given to Others: 1,229
Thanked 1,360 Times in 1,044 Posts
Blog Entries: 20
Karma Power: 443
Karma: 8773
bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.bobdoering is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Yahoo to bobdoering
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by qusys View Post

Automotive customers usually ask for Cpk major than 1.67. If you pursue ISO TS , AIAG blue books guidelines are usually seen as reference for process capability after input of the customers.
AIAG aslo specifies the exceptions, where Cpk or Ppk is not applicable. They are worth looking at - too many people ignore them (especially customers).
__________________
If we didn't care, we wouldn't share. That's why we're there.

Last edited by bobdoering; 20th January 2012 at 08:41 AM.
Thanks to bobdoering for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #6  
Old 28th June 2012, 09:10 AM
sylwia sylwia is offline
Getting Involved (6 to 9 Posts)

 
Registration Date: Feb 2007
Location: Poland
 
Posts: 9
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 26
Karma: 10
sylwia has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?

Value Cpk, Ppk must be agree with customer requirements.
Generally in automotive is: Cpk>=1,33, Ppk>=1,67 but for example for Daimler is: Cpk>=1,67, Ppk>=2,0; for Fiat Cpk, Ppk>=1,67
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Which standard Cpk value intervals are common or frequently used? EricLaro SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 5 1st March 2009 09:05 PM
Is Cpk a good measure of capability? There are several shortcomings of Cpk Tim Folkerts Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 31 12th February 2009 06:39 PM
Process Standard deviations and equivalence of Cp & Cpk anrappa Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 3 14th March 2002 02:25 AM
Cp and Cpk - Cpk is an index that should be applied to a stable process Don Winton Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 16 13th August 2001 05:50 PM
Cp & Cpk - How are you calculating the standard deviation? MSHELLEY Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 3 19th February 2001 06:35 AM



The time now is 06:17 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272