|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

20th January 2012, 12:33 AM
|
|
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)
Registration Date: May 2010
Location: India
|
|
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 13 Karma: 10 
|
|
Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?
hello sir,
can you please tell me Cpk should more than 1.33 or 1.67 and it is accroding to any standerd? how standerd deviation & Pp Ppk calculated.
Last edited by harry; 20th January 2012 at 01:01 AM.
Reason: Thread moved from: SPC and Injection Moulding
|

20th January 2012, 01:05 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
|
|
Posts: 2,867
Thanks Given to Others: 142
Thanked 917 Times in 476 Posts
Karma Power: 400
|
|
|
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by mahesh jadhav
hello sir,
can you please tell me Cpk should more than 1.33 or 1.67 and it is accroding to any standerd? how standerd deviation & Pp Ppk calculated.
|
There are various requirements for Cpk and Ppk.
Thee are specific requirements in the AIAG PPAP book but essentially the requirements are based on those of the customer.
These are minimum values
The calculation can be found b searching the forums
__________________
Lean starts with your documentation
Save trees
|
|
Thanks to Howard Atkins for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

20th January 2012, 05:43 AM
|
|
Appreciated Information Resource
Registration Date: Mar 2008
|
|
Posts: 2,043
Thanks Given to Others: 216
Thanked 645 Times in 571 Posts
Karma Power: 232
|
|
|
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by mahesh jadhav
hello sir,
can you please tell me Cpk should more than 1.33 or 1.67 and it is accroding to any standerd? how standerd deviation & Pp Ppk calculated.
|
Automotive customers usually ask for Cpk major than 1.67. If you pursue ISO TS , AIAG blue books guidelines are usually seen as reference for process capability after input of the customers.
|

20th January 2012, 07:03 AM
|
|
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)
Registration Date: May 2010
Location: India
|
|
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 13 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?
thanks.....
|

20th January 2012, 08:25 AM
|
 |
Stop X-bar/R Madness
Registration Date: May 2002
Location: LaGrange, OH
|
|
Posts: 3,817
Thanks Given to Others: 1,229
Thanked 1,360 Times in 1,044 Posts
Karma Power: 443
|
|
|
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by qusys
Automotive customers usually ask for Cpk major than 1.67. If you pursue ISO TS , AIAG blue books guidelines are usually seen as reference for process capability after input of the customers.
|
AIAG aslo specifies the exceptions, where Cpk or Ppk is not applicable. They are worth looking at - too many people ignore them (especially customers).
__________________
If we didn't care, we wouldn't share. That's why we're there.
Last edited by bobdoering; 20th January 2012 at 08:41 AM.
|
|
Thanks to bobdoering for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

28th June 2012, 09:10 AM
|
|
Getting Involved (6 to 9 Posts)
Registration Date: Feb 2007
Location: Poland
|
|
Posts: 9
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 26 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Re: Should Cpk be > 1.33 or 1.67 and according to which standard?
Value Cpk, Ppk must be agree with customer requirements.
Generally in automotive is: Cpk>=1,33, Ppk>=1,67 but for example for Daimler is: Cpk>=1,67, Ppk>=2,0; for Fiat Cpk, Ppk>=1,67
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Discussion Threads
|
| Discussion Thread Title |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post or Poll Vote |
|
Which standard Cpk value intervals are common or frequently used?
|
EricLaro |
SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques |
5 |
1st March 2009 09:05 PM |
|
Is Cpk a good measure of capability? There are several shortcomings of Cpk
|
Tim Folkerts |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
31 |
12th February 2009 06:39 PM |
|
Process Standard deviations and equivalence of Cp & Cpk
|
anrappa |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
3 |
14th March 2002 02:25 AM |
|
Cp and Cpk - Cpk is an index that should be applied to a stable process
|
Don Winton |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
16 |
13th August 2001 05:50 PM |
|
Cp & Cpk - How are you calculating the standard deviation?
|
MSHELLEY |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
3 |
19th February 2001 06:35 AM |
|
|