|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

11th July 2012, 06:58 AM
|
|
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)
Registration Date: Jul 2012
|
|
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 4 Karma: 10 
|
|
Capability & GDT Features - Surface Profiles, Line Profiles & Symmetries
Ok, I have read a few threads on the forumn but feel I need my own thread.
We have been asked to measure Surface Profiles, Line profiles & symmetries on injection moulded components. All have a unilateral tolerance ie 0-0.1mm.
How do we correctly upply capability to these? Currently we are using MiniTab to calculate a PPU value, only having an upper boundry. Our customer has queried this thinking we should be using 0 +/-0.05mm.
Any views on this?
|

12th July 2012, 01:41 AM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina.
|
|
Posts: 13,490
Thanks Given to Others: 2,972
Thanked 4,282 Times in 3,035 Posts
Karma Power: 1438
|
|
|
Re: Capability & GDT Features - Surface Profiles, Line Profiles & Symmetries
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Peter A
Ok, I have read a few threads on the forumn but feel I need my own thread.
We have been asked to measure Surface Profiles, Line profiles & symmetries on injection moulded components. All have a unilateral tolerance ie 0-0.1mm.
How do we correctly upply capability to these? Currently we are using MiniTab to calculate a PPU value, only having an upper boundry. Our customer has queried this thinking we should be using 0 +/-0.05mm.
Any views on this?
|
Welcome to The Cove Forums!
Do you have a sketch that shows the actual callouts? The default for profile of a line and profile of a surface is that the tolerance zone is equally disposed about the true profile. But without an actual drawing, I can not tell.
|

12th July 2012, 09:06 PM
|
 |
Stop X-bar/R Madness
Registration Date: May 2002
Location: LaGrange, OH
|
|
Posts: 3,842
Thanks Given to Others: 1,242
Thanked 1,372 Times in 1,053 Posts
Karma Power: 447
|
|
|
Re: Capability & GDT Features - Surface Profiles, Line Profiles & Symmetries
It would be nice to see some data, but my guess is your process variation distribution is a beta or Weibull distribution, non-normal - unless you are very far away from 0. Using Ppu alone is incorrect. It has a totally different meaning than Ppk. You most likely will need to transform the data to get an accurate understanding of your capability with "centering" - Ppk.
__________________
If we didn't care, we wouldn't share. That's why we're there.
|

13th July 2012, 07:20 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Canton, MI USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 161
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 75 Times in 48 Posts
Karma Power: 67
|
|
|
Re: Capability & GDT Features - Surface Profiles, Line Profiles & Symmetries
Profile is a tolerance with max and min boundaries that the surface must reside within. Those boundaries may be oriented and/or located to datum references or free to float.
No matter whether the limits are specified equal bilateral, unequal bilateral, or unilateral relative to the basic they can be treated as equal bilateral by figuring the offset for contour boundaries that have a specified basic displacement from datum references.
Since profile specifications may often be used to control non-generic forms... each measured point can be examined for its variability within the bilateral zone to an offset target mean (if necessary).
When a profile tolerance is applied to co-planar (or other) surfaces without datum references... then it is treated similar to flatness where one boundary "ZERO" is only approachable but never attainable... whether the surface is curved, flat, or other... as long as there are no opposed surfaces in the contour tolerance zone (eliciting a size situation) this would be a "one-sided" tolerance (zero to max).
If the profile zone is linked to a datum reference with a basic or is not linked with a basic but the contour wraps around any contour where there are opposed points it then it is not a "one-sided" tolerance.
Paul
Last edited by Paul F. Jackson; 13th July 2012 at 08:00 AM.
Reason: fix little mistakes
|
|
Thanks to Paul F. Jackson for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|