|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

25th October 2000, 04:22 PM
|
|
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Posts: 118
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 63 Karma: 20 
|
|
Receiving Inspection Techniques - What can we do to improve our current system?
I know this could be a huge question, but I promised I'd ask.
Our Receiving Inspection department currently uses good, solid (if unimaginative) inspection and reporting techniques. We know they're good because we've been doing the same thing for many years and the results have been acceptable. Now they're trying to climb out of the 'box,' thinking that there may be more efficient ways in terms of time and accuracy, e.g.; carrying laptops with current parts fabrication drawings to the inspection area(s), to be used both for inspecting and documenting (even this is old tech, but new to us).
While inspection is in my background, I was part of the old 'good, solid' system and don't know where to suggest they go to get really new ideas. No one's looking for change for the sake of change, they just want possibilities to consider.
Can anyone help with some direction here?
Thank you. Alf
|

26th October 2000, 03:04 AM
|
 |
Appreciated Member
Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 218
Thanks Given to Others: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 74 Karma: 72 
|
|
Why not start with a question like.....
"Why do we need to keep suffering the on-cost of goods inwards inspection?"
Sorry if you did not want to hear that and for being a little blunt. In the eighties we had around 30 goods inwards inspectors, now we have reliable suppliers and no inspectors.
Regards
Geoff
|

26th October 2000, 01:39 PM
|
|
|
|
I agree with Geoff,
Work with your suppliers on the prevention side and reduce the detection side on your end.
This may take some time, but quantifying an inspection frequency reduction with the proper sampling plans will reduce your cost and improve supplier performance.
ASD...
|

30th October 2000, 11:13 AM
|
|
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Posts: 118
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 63 Karma: 20 
|
|
Thanks for the replies. My goal years ago was to eliminate my job by certifying our suppliers. Maybe it's time to start pushing that idea again.
Regards, Alf.
|

31st October 2000, 12:59 AM
|
|
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Mar 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI USA
|
|
Posts: 122
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 25 
|
|
|
I hope that by certifying suppliers, you mean that you will verify that they have the processes in place to ensure that the next lot of parts you get are correct. Too many companies certify based on historical performance, and then find that when the guy who knew how to make your part left (died, quit, whatever) all you get is junk until someone else figures out how to make it.
Just IMHO.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Discussion Threads
|
| Discussion Thread Title |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post or Poll Vote |
|
Question: What are the techniques to improve the response to your query/post
|
v9991 |
Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports |
3 |
14th March 2011 07:37 PM |
|
Critical Characteristics in Incoming (Receiving) Inspection - Inspection Levels
|
luciano |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
18 |
21st April 2010 04:32 PM |
|
Variations in Tool Use Techniques and How to Improve Consistency?
|
keithm696 - 2008 |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
4 |
16th March 2008 08:34 AM |
|
Process Control Plan and Inspection Plans - Receiving and final inspection required?
|
krishkaar |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
8 |
3rd November 2004 06:46 AM |
|
Current Receiving Inspection activities - Reviewing, revising and improving
|
cyding |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
2 |
2nd September 2004 03:32 PM |
|
|