The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th November 2003, 03:21 PM
Dkucyk Dkucyk is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2003
Location: Detroit MI
 
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 25
Dkucyk has disabled his/her Karma.
Default Supplier Evaluation and Selection in the “Service” industry

I have a supplier evaluation process established but the Corporate QMR does not feel it meets the intent of 7.4.1. Here is my dilemma and maybe someone else out there can help me out.

I am the QMR of a Division of the Company. Our business is in Service. Our Division provides “People (Staff Augmentation)”. We are the prime contractor on a very large Omnibus Contract. We have 25 teammates (subcontractors). Our primary customer is the US Army (Acquisition). A Program Manager (PM) is short on Logisticians and we find a “loggie” to fulfill the requirement. They need someone to do graphic presentations and we hire a qualified graphics person. Get the drift?

Now the PM needs a Modeling and Simulation person and I can’t fill the position from my personnel resources. I have a teaming agreement with a subcontractor that can fill the position with a qualified person. They get the work and I get a pass through.

The Team we built (which took place a few years prior to ISO Certification) was based on some objective, some subjective and a little political reasoning. Since these 25 subs were around before my ISO Certification I have “grandfathered” them in based on their ability to supply a product IAW the customer’s requirements.

The subs are evaluated around quarterly when we do a Customer Satisfaction Survey with our Clients and a record of this review is maintained. Does anybody see any flaws here or something that would lead an external auditor to believe there was some sort of noncompliance here? I am attaching the process I developed for your review. Please feel free to comment. Thanks to all.

Doug
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting the post it is in, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: doc Supplier Performance Evaluation Procedure (Rev2).doc (71.0 KB, 1721 views)
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 14th November 2003, 12:09 AM
howste's Avatar
howste howste is offline
Thaumaturge

Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
 
Posts: 2,416
Thanks Given to Others: 377
Thanked 838 Times in 460 Posts
Karma Power: 206
Karma: 6556
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

7.4.1 allows you to determine the criteria for selection of suppliers. As long as you determine appropriate criteria, evaluate them, then have records of the results of the evaluation and any actions taken, you've met the requirements of the standard.

I would think that in addition to the vendor qualification process, you would also require qualification of the individual providing the service (7.4.2b). Has this been addressed?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 14th November 2003, 12:50 PM
Mike S. Mike S. is offline
An Early 'Cover'

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
 
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
Karma: 1849
Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Since you had a relationship rrior to ISO, ss long as you can show the other company's people have been doing the job well, I see no problem grandfathering them as "qualified based on prior history".
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Procedure for Supplier Selection and Performance Evaluation - Comprehensive Example andy.yuan Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5 30th August 2009 05:32 AM
Purchasing Procedure - Supplier selection, evaluation and re-evaluation Cari Spears Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 22 25th April 2006 08:48 PM
7.4.1. Supplier selection, evaluation and re-evaluation - McMaster, Grainger, etc. galcantar Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 9 23rd April 2006 07:25 AM
Purchasing - Supplier Evaluation vs. Selection - What is the difference? Andrews Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5 7th April 2005 02:10 PM
Supplier Evaluation and Selection for Electronic Parts gprasadhc Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3 7th April 2005 02:10 PM



The time now is 10:43 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts