|
|
 |
|

1st November 2001, 02:35 PM
|
|
Getting Involved (6 to 9 Posts)
Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Posts: 9
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 37 Karma: 10 
|
|
ISO14k Audit Day Requirements
I am presently in discussion with my registrar on the number of days required to perform a registration audit to ISO14k at one of our manufacturing sites.
I have been told that they will need 5 days, excluding the time needed before the audit for the documenation review, to do this.
This is one less day than required for a facility of 100 employees when attaining QS9000 registration. And I just don't understand WHY?!!?!!???
I have been told this number has been decided by the senior management at our registrar; but I cannot figure out what will be audited for 5 whole days.
Can anyone clarify this for me?
Or, better yet, give me a benchmark for approximate lengths that other registration audits have been so that I can take that information to our registrar!
We are manufacturers of acoustical products for the automotive industry. Our materials are virtually non-hazardous to people. Our product waste is somewhat unfriendly but its volume is what is of environmental concern. The location of the facility brings into it a lot of wildlife, flora, etc., that is an aspect. But FIVE DAYS of auditing, I just can't see how!
Thanks for the input.
Mary-K.
|

1st November 2001, 02:43 PM
|
|
|
Last place I worked:
1 Day for desk (document) audit.
4 days 1 Auditor
250 employees
|

1st November 2001, 03:11 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
|
|
Posts: 6,305
Thanks Given to Others: 34
Thanked 1,306 Times in 842 Posts
Karma Power: 406
|
|
The European Accreditation of Certification (EAC) provides a guidline (EN 45012) for determining the number of audit days needed to conduct a QMS audit. Right now I don't know of a 14K specific document. Also look at the attached chart to help you out.
Last edited by Randy; 25th March 2008 at 11:09 PM.
|

1st November 2001, 06:45 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ont. Cda.
Age: 51
|
|
Posts: 66
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 38 Karma: 12 
|
|
We are 1 day Level 1 and 5 days for the audit. (700 employees) While we haven't gone through the reg audit as yet, we have an agreement with our registrar since we feel 2-3 days is plenty, that if they finish early we will only be billed for the actual time.
|

1st November 2001, 07:07 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
|
|
Posts: 6,305
Thanks Given to Others: 34
Thanked 1,306 Times in 842 Posts
Karma Power: 406
|
|
And they agreed to this?
They said they didn't want the additional thousands of dollars for audit days because they're great guys and are concerned about your bank account.
Who are these guys? I don't wanna work for them.
|

5th November 2001, 09:27 AM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Warren, MI
|
|
Posts: 548
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 68
|
|
I'm in the middle of a couple 14K registrations with clients. Both are using the same auditor. The registrar REQUIRES a pre-assessment of one day, which includes on on-site document review. The number of audit days was pre-set after the application, but the auditor can adjust the days as necessary. They want to confirm on site that the list of impacts on the application is correct. One client is a paint manufacturer with all kinds of potentially nasty impacts - 1000+ gallons MEK, etc. They also have tons of DEQ paperwork that need to be audited. The other assembles robots and their worst impact is a five gallon bucket of oil. The final registration will be 3-4 days for the paint company, 1-1.5 for the robots. Both companies are about the same number of employees.
Tom
|

5th November 2001, 12:30 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
|
|
Posts: 6,305
Thanks Given to Others: 34
Thanked 1,306 Times in 842 Posts
Karma Power: 406
|
|
That sounds about right. My present client (1000+ employees) makes satellites (the kind that go into space not the car). The pre-assessment was 4 days (1 auditor) and the registration will be 2 days (2 auditors) for a total of 8 audit days.
|

5th November 2001, 12:47 PM
|
 |
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
|
|
Posts: 31
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 34 Karma: 15 
|
|
When I worked for a registrar, there was a lot of discussion about this.
Right now, there is NO REQUIREMENT for the stage 2 portion of the audit. (the previous post for a minimum of 1 day for stage 1 is correct).
Most registrars have some formula they go by, and there are several reccomendations out there, but there is no hard and fast rule.
If you already have a QMS in place, your audit will take less time then if you only have a 14000 system (because your people are used to the audit process, some of the system componants are the same, etc...) This is doubly so if you were lucky enough to have your QMS and EMS auditor be one and the same person (a rareity due to EMS requirements...)
We (when I worked for the registrar) always quoted High. But, we only charged for the amount of time we were actually on site (eg: we would quote 4 days, but if we were only on site 3 days, that's all you would pay...) You may want to see if your registrar has a similar policy.
Otherwise, if you truely feel like they've scheduled too much time, ask them to provide you with reasoning behind their decision (aside from the man behind the curtain came up with that number.) Tell them you are aware that there is no formal requirement. If you go in armed with the number of days from similar companies to yours, and inform them that you feel you're being gouged, they may reduce their number of days.
Good Luck
__________________
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
-Albert Einstein
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|