The Elsmar Cove Forum Unilateral / Bilateral Tolerances for dimensions with Double Plus or Minus Tolerance
 Forum User Name Keep Me Logged In Password
 Register Photo Albums Blogs FAQ Registered Visitors Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Search the Elsmar Cove @import url(http://www.google.com/cse/api/branding.css); Custom Search Monitor the Elsmar Forum Monitor New Forum Posts Follow Marc & Elsmar Elsmar Cove Groups Donate and \$ Contributor Forum Access Courtesy Quick Links Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge: Howard'sInternational Quality Services Marcelo Antunes'SQR Consulting Bob Doering'sCorrect SPC - Precision Machining NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers Quality Digest Portal IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology ASQ - American Society for Quality

#1
28th October 2002, 12:41 PM
 David E. Wagher Posts: 2
Unilateral / Bilateral Tolerances for dimensions with Double Plus or Minus Tolerance

What if any rules apply to the Unilateral / Bilateral Tolerances for dimensions with
Double Plus or Minus Tolerance?
Example: 0.250 -.010 to -.020

#2
28th October 2002, 02:15 PM
 M Greenaway Posts: 1,652
I dont know about any specific rules, or what context you are thinking of other than in broad statisitcal terms. However I dont believe there to be anything special about them, like any other tolerance you try to set your process mean on the mean of the tolerance. So a double minus or double plus of a nominal value is nothing special, just perhaps makes you think when you look for the mean of the tolerance.
#3
28th October 2002, 03:33 PM
 Sam Posts: 1,447
I would question the logic of using a tolerance that - XXX to -XXX. Appears to add nothing but confusion.
#4
29th October 2002, 08:50 AM
 Ravi Khare Posts: 70
If by uniateral, you mean one sided; then yes there is a rule. If you have a one sided tolerance (..surface roughness, perpendicularity, roundness) then the Process Capability Cpk should be calculated from whichever tolerance that is available.

I assume you are refering to rules for process centering and Cpk calculatons. If you are talking of any other rules please clarify.
#5
30th October 2002, 12:10 AM
 Ravi Khare Posts: 70
Quote:
 I would question the logic of using a tolerance that - XXX to -XXX. Appears to add nothing but confusion.
This convention evolves from the use of shaft basic and the hole basic systems. Even under the Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing, if a 20 mm diameter shaft has to assemble with a 20 mm diameter hole, tolerances on size, location and form will lead to worst case envelopes (Virtual Conditions... as defined by the GD&T standard) on the hole as well the shaft. These virtual condition envelopes will have to clear each other if assembly is desired. The 20 mm nominal diameter hole will then have both the tolerances on the positive side, and the 20 mm nominal diameter shaft will have both the tolerances on the negative side.

This could be one of the explainations. For process control however, as Martin suggests, there is nothing special about it. You have to put your process center on the mean tolerance.
#6
22nd November 2002, 03:17 PM
 David E. Wagher Posts: 2
I thank you all for the responses.
#7
3rd June 2006, 07:10 AM
 sjvasudevan Posts: 8
Query on that subject

Hi All,
It is just related to this topic. Can any one help me out of this doubt.

I have a Limit Tolerance such as Ø25.40-Ø25.55. The print says it is special as per customer. Can you suggest how do I fix parameters for capability studies? What is the design intent of MEAN?

#8
3rd June 2006, 09:27 AM
 Jim Wynne Posts: 14,077
Quote:
 In Reply to Parent Post by sjvasudevan Hi All, It is just related to this topic. Can any one help me out of this doubt. I have a Limit Tolerance such as Ø25.40-Ø25.55. The print says it is special as per customer. Can you suggest how do I fix parameters for capability studies? What is the design intent of MEAN? Thanks in advance.
The "parameters" are the upper and lower tolerance limits; the nominal is 24.475 (although in this case it does represent the mean of the upper and lower limits, it's still better to refer to it as "nominal" because sometimes the tolerances limits aren't symmetrical). Only the designer knows for sure what the design intent is; you have to assume that if the part doesn't meet the tolerance limits, it won't work.

 The Elsmar Cove Forum Unilateral / Bilateral Tolerances for dimensions with Double Plus or Minus Tolerance

 Bookmarks

 Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)

 Forum Posting Settings You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

 Similar Discussion Threads Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote rnsvasan Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 7 6th April 2010 08:30 AM lebelg Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 5 24th March 2009 09:52 AM Caster Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5 2nd September 2008 04:03 PM pinpin - 2009 Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 3 27th March 2008 03:07 PM kedarg6500 Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1 6th February 2006 04:14 PM

The time now is 07:55 PM. All times are GMT -4.