N
Nikonangel
Did anyone ever submit an appeal on the new rules - ISO/TS16949 regarding removal of site extensions, and consequent requirement for a separate Stage 2 audit?
We've submitted one to our registrar but got denied. We wanted to take it to the next level as we feel that our buildings have always been part of 1 site (the registrar just claimed that 1 is an extension because of the 2 buildings although there never was a declared extension on scope of certificate). The 2 buildings are part of 1 process flow, and if we put a tunnel between the 2 structures then we will not be covered by this change in the rules, which we find totally unreasonable.
Not sure how to file an IATF appeal, does anyone know the procedure?
Thanks very much for the help!!!
We've submitted one to our registrar but got denied. We wanted to take it to the next level as we feel that our buildings have always been part of 1 site (the registrar just claimed that 1 is an extension because of the 2 buildings although there never was a declared extension on scope of certificate). The 2 buildings are part of 1 process flow, and if we put a tunnel between the 2 structures then we will not be covered by this change in the rules, which we find totally unreasonable.
Not sure how to file an IATF appeal, does anyone know the procedure?
Thanks very much for the help!!!