The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Miner's MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Blog 
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis)
Forum Username

Wooden Line

Acceptable Gage R&R Output Results - EV, AV, R&R, PV, and TV

Wooden Line
Search the Elsmar Cove
Search Elsmar
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 3rd November 2000, 04:37 PM

Posts: n/a
Gage R&R Output

I'm new to Gage R&R and am trying to determine what is the industry standard for a "good" result. The spreadsheet I downloaded outputs results for EV, AV, R&R, PV, and TV. Which output is the best to base judgments about the equipment on? And what is a typical acceptable value?

Your help is appreciated.

Sponsored Links
Old 3rd November 2000, 05:41 PM
Al Dyer

Posts: n/a

If you are in the automotive industry I would look in the AIAG MSA manual for general requirements for R&R. This general guideline is based on a 10%, 20%, 30% scale.

A realistic guideline should be determined based on the measurement discrimination required for the use of a specific gage. These guidelines should be noted in the appropriate areas of your quality system documentation.

R&R is a good place to start but the MSA system needs to evolve to determine bias, linearity, and stability.

This is a very general overview and I hope other members of the forum will have further input.


Al Dyer
Mngt. Rep.
Sponsored Links

Old 6th November 2000, 04:10 AM
Atul Khandekar's Avatar
Atul Khandekar

Posts: 1,370
R&R upto 10% means the measurement system is acceptable. If it is between 10% and 30%, the system may be acceptable on the basis of criticalitu of application. A lot of subject matter knowledge would have to go into justifying acceptability.

In addition, you should consider Control Chart analysis for every operator to determine influence of operator and methods over overall R&R. Control charts can also help determine adequacy of part-to-part variation.

Lastly, there are 2 more ways of determining adequacy of the system for a particular application, viz,
1.comparison of R&R error with Standard Deviation of the manufacturing process you are trying to control and
2.comparison of R&R error with design Tolerance.

These two methods would show you how much of your process std deviation (or tolerance) is 'eaten up' by measurement system error.


Old 3rd December 2000, 02:33 AM

Posts: n/a
dear atul
as you have said that acceptance limit is 10 % is good. But can you give e.g. of instrument supplier name who give / supply instrument with 10% RR with respect to process variation.

Old 4th December 2000, 12:11 AM
Atul Khandekar's Avatar
Atul Khandekar

Posts: 1,370
I doubt if any gage manufacturer can actually guarantee 10% R&R.

You may refer to the discussions under the thread 'New Gage R&R' on this forum.

Old 6th December 2000, 08:24 AM

Posts: n/a

Dear Sir.
I need your helping about the procedures to measure the capability and R&R of torque Wrenchers, thanks for for your helping.
Please send information

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis)

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Conclusions from weird GR&R (Gage R&R) Results - 9 of 12 points have NDC of 1 Chickenchaser Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3 13th July 2011 08:50 AM
Using the results from GR&R (Gage R&R) Analysis - One sided dimension swarbur4 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 25 25th August 2009 07:05 AM
Is this GR&R (Gage R&R) acceptable on the surface Creech Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 36 27th May 2008 11:16 AM
What are Acceptable Limits for Gage R&R Results Sean Kelley Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6 11th November 2005 04:47 PM
Acceptable Gage R&R - What is acceptable %error for Gage R&R Jim Jakosh Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3 13th November 2001 02:49 PM

The time now is 11:05 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


Marc Timothy Smith -
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".