|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

15th June 2012, 11:03 AM
|
 |
A Sea of Statistics
Registration Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
|
|
Posts: 290
Thanks Given to Others: 180
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 41
|
|
Feature Control Frame is applied to the end of a Cylinder - Datum Dilemma
Hi To All Covers,
I have a problem where, the following Feature Control Frame is applied to the end of a cylinder, a planar datum C, the FCF is a 0.2 perdendicularity control, referenced to Datum A-B (an axis datum established by circular and cylindrical datum targets) and to Datum C??? If Datum C is perdendicular to Datum A-B, why the self Datum??? What does the Datum C reference yield??
Puzzled....thanks for your assistance.
Regards,
Marty
__________________
"The best diplomat that I know is a fully-loaded phaser bank." -- Lt. Cdr. Montgomery Scott
|

15th June 2012, 12:59 PM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina.
|
|
Posts: 13,414
Thanks Given to Others: 2,942
Thanked 4,268 Times in 3,025 Posts
Karma Power: 1429
|
|
|
Re: Datum Dilemma
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by optomist1
Hi To All Covers,
I have a problem where, the following Feature Control Frame is applied to the end of a cylinder, a planar datum C, the FCF is a 0.2 perdendicularity control, referenced to Datum A-B (an axis datum established by circular and cylindrical datum targets) and to Datum C??? If Datum C is perdendicular to Datum A-B, why the self Datum??? What does the Datum C reference yield??
Puzzled....thanks for your assistance.
Regards,
Marty
|
Marty,
From Advanced Concepts of GD&T by Alex?
Stijloor.
Last edited by Stijloor; 15th June 2012 at 04:58 PM.
Reason: Found possible reference
|

19th June 2012, 11:59 AM
|
 |
A Sea of Statistics
Registration Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
|
|
Posts: 290
Thanks Given to Others: 180
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 41
|
|
|
Re: Datum Dilemma
Hi Stijloor,
Sorry for the late response.....preparing for a new position, and studying for the GD&T test, yes it is Alex's text, waiting for access to a scanner then I'll upload it. If you have access to Alex's Advanced Concepts of GD&T text, see page 15-8, figure 15-7, I may have figured it out, but would appreciate a little Stuart Smalley affirmation. I beleive the answer is that when Datum Targets are used (in this case Circular Line and Cylindrical Area) to establish a Primary Datum/Axis, any Feature Control Frame that references the Primary Datum needs to include a Secondary Datum..in this case Planar Datum C is the Secondary Datum....
On page 15-10 Figure 15-9 a similar situation is present; in this case only Datum Target Points (3 ea at one end and 3 ea at the other end) are used to establish a Primary Datum Axis. In this case any Feature Control Frame that references the Primary Datum, Secondary and Tertiary Datums are needed.
Took a little digging but I think I have it...
Thanks for your assistance.
Marty
__________________
"The best diplomat that I know is a fully-loaded phaser bank." -- Lt. Cdr. Montgomery Scott
|

20th June 2012, 12:12 PM
|
 |
A Sea of Statistics
Registration Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
|
|
Posts: 290
Thanks Given to Others: 180
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 41
|
|
|
Re: Feature Control Frame is applied to the end of a Cylinder - Datum Dilemma
Hi Stijloor,
Attached are the two previously mentioned figures.....
Thank you for your input...
Marty
__________________
"The best diplomat that I know is a fully-loaded phaser bank." -- Lt. Cdr. Montgomery Scott
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Discussion Threads
|
| Discussion Thread Title |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post or Poll Vote |
|
Clarification on Position with Bonus Tolerance - Feature Control Frame
|
GRS&S |
Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) |
12 |
18th February 2013 12:36 PM |
|
Digging Datums - Feature control frame (FCF) applied to a pipe I.D.
|
optomist1 |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
4 |
13th February 2012 11:41 AM |
|
Multiple Single Segment Feature Control Frame
|
optomist1 |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
8 |
29th June 2011 04:15 PM |
|
Feature Control Frame - Interpretation - Two Tolerances?
|
Manix |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
8 |
2nd February 2011 02:49 PM |
|
GD&T - True Position - "Boundary" under the feature control frame
|
jager |
ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories |
10 |
10th June 2003 03:06 PM |
|
|