The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Quality Manager Issues > Quality Management Related Issues
Forum Username


Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links







Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Sponsored Links
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's
International Quality Services

Atul's
Symphony Technologies

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting

Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


Related Topic Tags
iso 9001 - quality management systems, production line, revalidation of a process or product
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #9  
Old 20th August 2012, 11:06 AM
thebestroe thebestroe is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

 
Registration Date: Aug 2012
 
Posts: 2
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 4
Karma: 10
thebestroe has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Re: ISO 9001 clause that covers Production Line Re-Validation

I stand corrected. We are 9001:2008. Do you know of any conflicts that would arise referencing ISO 9013:2002 in our work instructions to validate our HI def plasma processes. Specifically it would be the deviation and angle chart for themal cut parts.

Sponsored Links
  #10  
Old 20th August 2012, 11:51 AM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna Sidney Vianna is offline
Post Responsibly

 
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA - USofA
 
Posts: 7,690
Thanks Given to Others: 1,589
Thanked 4,617 Times in 2,423 Posts
Karma Power: 879
Karma: 31511
Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: ISO 9001 clause that covers Production Line Re-Validation

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by thebestroe View Post

Do you know of any conflicts that would arise referencing ISO 9013:2002 in our work instructions to validate our HI def plasma processes.
ISO 9001 is a (quality) management system standard and does not conflict with any product or process related standards.
__________________
Sustainable conformity assessment must add value to all stakeholders
Thanks to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  #11  
Old 20th August 2012, 03:25 PM
Big Jim Big Jim is offline
Appreciated Information Resource

 
Registration Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA, Southern California
 
Posts: 1,917
Thanks Given to Others: 846
Thanked 829 Times in 568 Posts
Karma Power: 224
Karma: 5724
Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: ISO clause that covers Production Line Re-Validation

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Mikishots View Post

AS9100C clearly identifies this requirement under clause 7.5.1.1 (usually referred to as first article inspection) Unfortunately, this is not detailed under ISO9001-2008 (one of the improvements that the ISO group can make for the next revision).

You would need to refer to Clause 8.2.4, which requires the organization to monitor and measure the characteristics of the parts coming off that line to make sure that the product requirements are still being met. The resulting records are to show proof that the part is still what the customer requires, and that you have a record of who signed-off saying that everything was good to go for a production run.

To ask if it's "required" is really a moot point, in my opinion - it would be a massive and unnecessary risk to NOT revalidate that moved line prior to resuming production. I couldn't imagine any organization that would entertain an idea like that (but maybe I'm just naive).
Loosely speaking the requirements in 7.5.1 (Control of Production) and 8.2.4 (Monitoring and Measurement of Product) are the closest topics in ISO 9001:2008, but there is nothing to keep you from requiring additional things to ensure that you are getting what you want. That would fall under 7.4.2 (Purchasing Information). There is nothing to keep you from requiring either PPAP or First Article just because they are only ISO 9001:2008. Don't expect such extras to be free though.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Quality Manager Issues > Quality Management Related Issues

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ISO 9001 Clause 7.5.2 - Validation of Process for Production and Service Provision baynoli ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 16 12th December 2011 04:43 AM
Control of Production Procedure - ISO 9001 Clause 7.5.1 Jminniti ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 6 11th November 2011 10:00 AM
Validation - The process or product? ISO 9001 Clause 7.3.6 QAMTY ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 20 25th November 2009 11:36 PM
Process Validation - Production Line Transferring to a Different Facility Keep Smiling Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 11 19th February 2008 04:42 PM
Questions About Exclusions in ISO 9001 - Clause 7.5 Production and Service provision qualitygoddess - 2010 Service Industry Specific Topics 6 23rd October 2007 09:59 PM



The time now is 08:57 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272