S
saintly
I joined this community recently, when I learned that our QAM was being fired. At that time it was decided that I would take over the majority of his duties as QAM. I was assured that I would be given a raise, and I assumed it would come with a new title.
Currently my primary title is Document Control Coordinator. I've been in charge of quality documents for 2 years, during which I've completely rewritten the QMS and had great luck implementing a number of changes that make it actually work for the company. To further assist the company I became ISO13485 certified in early '08, and began performing the internal audits as well as attending external audits and management review meetings. Recently I've been the go-to gal when we are proving compliance to a country we plan to sell in.
While I am not really qualified to take over as QAM, I didn't think it was that much of a stretch as I had been directly assisting the QAM for some time and had put quite a bit of effort into learning the standards. But, when it came down to it they decided I wasn't management material and they've hired someone with more age and office experience (but no ISO or regulatory experience--I'm expected to train them on that).
I spent the first part of this week a little hurt at my lost promotion, but I was starting to feel ok about it. After all, we have two big audits coming up this fall and I'd have a chance to show my value. But that got me thinking about my value here. I'm a Michigan girl, and a newb to both California and this type of work. To be honest, when I landed the position I was just happy to have a paycheck whatever the number on it was.
So I did some research. The national average salary for someone with my job title is nearly $20 thousand higher per year than what I make currently, and that isn't even taking into consideration the specialized regulatory work I do--just document control.
Ok, maybe the company is just cheap and everyone is underpaid. They are pretty small, after all.
So I chatted with my friend the customer service rep. When I divulged my salary she was so embarrassed that she refused to tell me exactly how much more she makes than I do. All she would say is that she didn't understand how they thought I could live on what I make.
Then I found the ad the company listed for the position that will be absorbing the QAM role--the one I am to train in everything I know about ISO. If the company keeps their promises this person will be making fully twice my salary.
So my question is: am I right in thinking that something unfair is going on here? Or is a pay gap that large something I should expect as a person with limited experience? Additionally, if I am being paid unfairly is there a way to avoid it being perpetuated by future oportunistic employers?
Currently my primary title is Document Control Coordinator. I've been in charge of quality documents for 2 years, during which I've completely rewritten the QMS and had great luck implementing a number of changes that make it actually work for the company. To further assist the company I became ISO13485 certified in early '08, and began performing the internal audits as well as attending external audits and management review meetings. Recently I've been the go-to gal when we are proving compliance to a country we plan to sell in.
While I am not really qualified to take over as QAM, I didn't think it was that much of a stretch as I had been directly assisting the QAM for some time and had put quite a bit of effort into learning the standards. But, when it came down to it they decided I wasn't management material and they've hired someone with more age and office experience (but no ISO or regulatory experience--I'm expected to train them on that).
I spent the first part of this week a little hurt at my lost promotion, but I was starting to feel ok about it. After all, we have two big audits coming up this fall and I'd have a chance to show my value. But that got me thinking about my value here. I'm a Michigan girl, and a newb to both California and this type of work. To be honest, when I landed the position I was just happy to have a paycheck whatever the number on it was.
So I did some research. The national average salary for someone with my job title is nearly $20 thousand higher per year than what I make currently, and that isn't even taking into consideration the specialized regulatory work I do--just document control.
Ok, maybe the company is just cheap and everyone is underpaid. They are pretty small, after all.
So I chatted with my friend the customer service rep. When I divulged my salary she was so embarrassed that she refused to tell me exactly how much more she makes than I do. All she would say is that she didn't understand how they thought I could live on what I make.
Then I found the ad the company listed for the position that will be absorbing the QAM role--the one I am to train in everything I know about ISO. If the company keeps their promises this person will be making fully twice my salary.
So my question is: am I right in thinking that something unfair is going on here? Or is a pay gap that large something I should expect as a person with limited experience? Additionally, if I am being paid unfairly is there a way to avoid it being perpetuated by future oportunistic employers?