T
topstriker
in the past we have allowed our electronics team have control over test. Although this may seem the simplest solution it has lead to a bank of test, ICT, PCB and post assembly that eat up NRE, operators and lead time.
I am attempting a new approach using FMEA. The electronics guys normally start with a test specification of all tests they want to carry out before developing the appropriate test plan. At this stage i plan to carry out and FMEA on the test spec. We will use several factors to calculate the RPN. We will consider if future tests will carry out the same fail. I think to determine the risk of fail i need to consider the number of opportunities for failure. I think maybe the best way is to look at the number of components measured through the test and score the test on the number of devices, type of devices and legs on the devices.
If anyone can suggest any other ideas worth considering how to grade the test then that would be great
Paul
I am attempting a new approach using FMEA. The electronics guys normally start with a test specification of all tests they want to carry out before developing the appropriate test plan. At this stage i plan to carry out and FMEA on the test spec. We will use several factors to calculate the RPN. We will consider if future tests will carry out the same fail. I think to determine the risk of fail i need to consider the number of opportunities for failure. I think maybe the best way is to look at the number of components measured through the test and score the test on the number of devices, type of devices and legs on the devices.
If anyone can suggest any other ideas worth considering how to grade the test then that would be great
Paul