The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Medical Devices, Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics > Medical Device Related Standards > IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series
Forum Username


Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links







Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Sponsored Links
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's
International Quality Services

Atul's
Symphony Technologies

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting

Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


Related Topic Tags
510(k), fda (food and drug administration), iec 60601 - medical electrical equipment, letter to file (fda term)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #9  
Old 26th July 2012, 01:32 PM
robert.beck robert.beck is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Apr 2011
 
Posts: 37
Thanks Given to Others: 22
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 12
Karma: 113
robert.beck is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.robert.beck is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Re: Dealing with Device/Design changes by a "Letter to File" vs. 60601 Retesting

a related question ..

how does one go about determining what critical components are (in terms of testing - the test house requires a list of critical components)?

Sponsored Links
  #10  
Old 27th July 2012, 10:54 PM
raymond02302 raymond02302 is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Mar 2011
Location: China
 
Posts: 56
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 14
Karma: 115
raymond02302 is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.raymond02302 is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Re: Dealing with Device/Design changes by a "Letter to File" vs. 60601 Retesting

A critical components are all the components that can impair the safety of the appliance if replaced by components that are similar but not the same as far as the electrical and mechanical features are concerned. such as components assuring insulation between pri circuit and sec circuit (transformer, optical isolatior, X, Y capacitor), patient circuit and live part/enclosure (optical isolator, non-optical isolator) etc.
Of cource, if one component's specificaton can affect compliance with standard, this component should be treated as critical components. for eg. components affecting residual voltage (bleeding resistor), defibrillation protection (GDT), temperature test (sink design, opening) and so on.
Thanks to raymond02302 for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  #11  
Old 5th August 2012, 10:32 PM
Peter Selvey Peter Selvey is offline
Appreciated Information Resource

 
Registration Date: Oct 2009
Location: Japan / Ise
 
Posts: 629
Thanks Given to Others: 35
Thanked 474 Times in 324 Posts
Karma Power: 86
Karma: 4719
Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Peter Selvey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: Dealing with Device/Design changes by a "Letter to File" vs. 60601 Retesting

For the first question, it appeared to be related when to notify the FDA of changes associated with 60601 compliance. For this I would not recommend consulting a test lab as they have a different point of view. The test lab thinks in terms of "certified product", in which case any change affecting compliance should be reported. For example, if you change the PCB tracks around a the isolation barrier, you need to report this change, even if you still keep the required spacing.

The FDA does not approve or certify the device per se, and they don't have the resources to be checking minor details like changing the layouts of a PCB track. They expect you to handle those things internally (or with your test lab). The FDA is more likely to be interested in bigger things like a change the intended purpose of a device.

With respect to component lists: in principle these are intended to keep track of all parts which affect compliance. But in practice this is really hard to do because there are so many parts. As a result, there is kind of unwritten agreement on particular components should be in the list, with a small variation depending the agency or office you are dealing with.

These lists are intended for use by the factory inspectors to check there are no changes for certified products (e.g. NRTL marks).

Regardless of what is on the list, manufacturers are still required to report changes that affect compliance for certified products (it is part of the general contract for product certification). It is a common mistake that manufacturers limit reporting of changes only for parts on the list.
Thank You to Peter Selvey for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Medical Devices, Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics > Medical Device Related Standards > IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Change of Existing Medical Devices and 510(k) - "Letter to File" and "Add to File" temujin US Medical Devices (21 CFR part 820) 18 26th April 2011 10:26 PM
Submitting a 510(k)-the cuff individually or the system wangyang US Medical Devices (21 CFR part 820) 2 5th September 2009 09:19 AM
Material Change - New 10993 Testing and Submitting a New 510(k) temujin US Medical Devices (21 CFR part 820) 4 11th September 2007 06:34 AM
Submitting a letter of resignation and calling it quits EtobiLad - 2009 Career and Occupation Discussions 11 22nd January 2007 01:09 PM
Design History File - Medical Device Quality Systems Manual Section 3, Design Control Mark Smith Design and Development - Process and Product 1 26th May 1999 11:32 AM



The time now is 06:50 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272