there is no 'law' against it. earlier versions of
FMEA had detection ratings adn employed them in the calculation of the 'RPN' value. current modern thinking dismisses the RPN and detection and ratings forvarious reasons mainly becasue the RPN canbe quite misleading in allowing high severity and high occurence items go un-mitigated. This can result in high yield loss putting delivery at risk, high reqork increasing cost and the possibility of escape to the field (very few detection schemes are really foolproof). since occurence and detection are mostly opinion based - rather than data based - The RPN has resulted in 'manipuation' of the values to get an RPN that doesn't require action. I have even seen severity - which should be fairly strighforward - be 'negotiated' with detrimental effects.
Your Customer may not want you to add Detection back in. Some industry guidelines have also dismissed detection 'requiring' the use of only severity and occurence and the 'classification' of a failure mode instead of the RPN. You might want to consult your Customer and/or industry standards...