L.S.
We had an in-house discussion on how to interpret the phrase "Any or All" that is used in various clauses. My native English team-leader says that the common interpretation of the phrase is apply it on one, all or any combination.
I am native Dutch and I try to interpret it the way it best suits me: as literally either all or a single element of (worst case) choice. My rationale being that in USA law texts the phrase "the combination of Any or All" is frequently used. And that my interpretation is more in the spirit of fault conditions. In this I presume that the wording of all IEC-60601 text is well thought and deliberately chosen.
The proof of this pudding is in the eating by our test house and NB, but before we turn to them both my team-leader and me would like some more ammo to shoot at each other.
What is the common opinion of this forum on this matter?
We had an in-house discussion on how to interpret the phrase "Any or All" that is used in various clauses. My native English team-leader says that the common interpretation of the phrase is apply it on one, all or any combination.
I am native Dutch and I try to interpret it the way it best suits me: as literally either all or a single element of (worst case) choice. My rationale being that in USA law texts the phrase "the combination of Any or All" is frequently used. And that my interpretation is more in the spirit of fault conditions. In this I presume that the wording of all IEC-60601 text is well thought and deliberately chosen.
The proof of this pudding is in the eating by our test house and NB, but before we turn to them both my team-leader and me would like some more ammo to shoot at each other.
What is the common opinion of this forum on this matter?