U
uneev
How do you interpret this standard?
We are ISO 9001:2000 certified and also accredited from URAC. I have been reviewing the standard for each certification to look for some common grounds, so we are not duplicating our efforts.
The ISO std. 5.6 states that the top management shall review the co’s quality mgt. system to ensure its effectiveness. The std. also lists various items that should be discussed in the management review. Something similar is also required by URAC.
I am suggesting that instead of having similar meetings with the same people – hence duplicating. We have just one executive head (VP’s & up) meeting where I would be the quality rep. to discuss all quality items – whether ISO, URAC etc… All the executive heads will meet with their direct reports to bring back all quality items relating to their respective departments. We plan on meeting quarterly.
My quality coordinator thinks that this is not a good idea and that we should meet monthly and that should include everyone from the directors to the president. He thinks that this is what is meant by ‘Top Management’ according to ISO.
I know the standard is open to interpretation but am I wrong in assuming that the executive heads should be able to get their updates to the one meeting and that we don’t need to have every manager/director included in there?
We are ISO 9001:2000 certified and also accredited from URAC. I have been reviewing the standard for each certification to look for some common grounds, so we are not duplicating our efforts.
The ISO std. 5.6 states that the top management shall review the co’s quality mgt. system to ensure its effectiveness. The std. also lists various items that should be discussed in the management review. Something similar is also required by URAC.
I am suggesting that instead of having similar meetings with the same people – hence duplicating. We have just one executive head (VP’s & up) meeting where I would be the quality rep. to discuss all quality items – whether ISO, URAC etc… All the executive heads will meet with their direct reports to bring back all quality items relating to their respective departments. We plan on meeting quarterly.
My quality coordinator thinks that this is not a good idea and that we should meet monthly and that should include everyone from the directors to the president. He thinks that this is what is meant by ‘Top Management’ according to ISO.
I know the standard is open to interpretation but am I wrong in assuming that the executive heads should be able to get their updates to the one meeting and that we don’t need to have every manager/director included in there?