The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Management Review Meetings and related Processes
Forum Username


Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links







Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Sponsored Links
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's
International Quality Services

Atul's
Symphony Technologies

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting

Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th November 2004, 11:53 AM
MVladimir MVladimir is offline
Involved - Posts

 
Registration Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
 
Posts: 63
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Karma Power: 42
Karma: 20
MVladimir has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Cl. 5.6.1: Quality Objectives Review - Part of Management Review?

Cl. 5.6.1. ISO 9001 requires from the organization to assess opportunities for improvement and the need for changes to the quality management system, including the quality policy and quality objectives. At the same time in accordance with Cl. 5.4.1. quality objectives shall be established at relevant functions and levels within the organization.
Does the records from management reviews shall necessarily include review of quality objectives, established at relevant levels?

I hope your help,
MVladimir

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 16th November 2004, 12:20 PM
RCBeyette's Avatar
RCBeyette RCBeyette is offline
When in doubt - THINK!

 
Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 38
 
Posts: 2,668
Thanks Given to Others: 409
Thanked 666 Times in 395 Posts
Blog Entries: 2
Karma Power: 332
Karma: 9958
RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to RCBeyette
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by MVladimir

Cl. 5.6.1. ISO 9001 requires from the organization to assess opportunities for improvement and the need for changes to the quality management system, including the quality policy and quality objectives. At the same time in accordance with Cl. 5.4.1. quality objectives shall be established at relevant functions and levels within the organization.
Does the records from management reviews shall necessarily include review of quality objectives, established at relevant levels?
If I may, I'd like to answer your question with a question...

How can you assess Opportunities for Improvement and the need for changes to the QMS, including Quality Objectives, without reviewing Quality Objectives (and whether they have been established at relevent levels or not)?

If you look at 5.6.2 "Review input", f) and g) focus on changes to the system and recommendations for improvement. This could mean changing the quality objectives, or how they have been implemented, or how they have been established.

I think that it would make very good sense if the records from Management Review showed that the Quality Objectives were reviewed by Management and found to be suitable - or reviewed and found not to be suitable and appropriate action items generated.

Just my
__________________
~ Roxane ~
"There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line." - Oscar Levant
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 16th November 2004, 12:25 PM
db's Avatar
db db is offline
Where's the shall?

 
Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 56
 
Posts: 2,519
Thanks Given to Others: 405
Thanked 413 Times in 271 Posts
Karma Power: 309
Karma: 4865
db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Two parts to this answer. First, the quality objectives requirements are at two levels; global requirements, and requirements specific to the product.

Second, management review needs to include quality objectives. So does that mean that all objectives need to be be reviewed? As stated above, what is required for continual improvement and the need for changes? Those objectives (from any level) that are related to improvement and change need to be reviewed.

This means that each management review should be looking at different objectives, depending on which lead to changes or opportunities for improvement.
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
  #4  
Old 16th November 2004, 12:47 PM
RCBeyette's Avatar
RCBeyette RCBeyette is offline
When in doubt - THINK!

 
Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 38
 
Posts: 2,668
Thanks Given to Others: 409
Thanked 666 Times in 395 Posts
Blog Entries: 2
Karma Power: 332
Karma: 9958
RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to RCBeyette
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by db

This means that each management review should be looking at different objectives, depending on which lead to changes or opportunities for improvement.
We also look at what we have and ask "Is this working for us? Is this still true? Does this mean something to us?"
__________________
~ Roxane ~
"There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line." - Oscar Levant
  #5  
Old 18th November 2004, 11:38 AM
Shaun Daly's Avatar
Shaun Daly Shaun Daly is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Feb 2003
Location: England
Age: 46
 
Posts: 95
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 51
Karma: 177
Shaun Daly is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Shaun Daly is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
We hold MR's quarterly.

The FIRST THING in the MR report I present to the Management is the 3 months worth of Quality Objective data, and "other" support measures.

Our Assessors love it, especially as all the trends (except for one) are going the right way.
__________________
Im not really insane, its just the job......
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Management Review Meetings and related Processes

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Auditing Management Review - Who audits the management review process? qualityboi ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5 8th July 2011 05:40 PM
Quality Objectives - Review and Update quality person Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4 20th October 2010 01:01 AM
Management Review Frequency - How Many Times of Management Review a Year? s_warin Management Review Meetings and related Processes 29 25th September 2008 03:47 AM
Section 7.3.4.1, a part of Management Review? qualityboi ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1 3rd March 2008 08:11 PM
Our Quality Policy and Objectives - Please review and comment aydin ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 7 29th November 2006 03:39 PM



The time now is 10:39 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272