|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |
|

16th November 2004, 04:13 PM
|
 |
Living the Dream...
Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Michigan, USA
Age: 43
|
|
Posts: 414
Thanks Given to Others: 44
Thanked 44 Times in 35 Posts
Karma Power: 94
|
|
HT2005 - New AIAG Standard for Heat Treating?
Has anyone heard of a new AIAG standard that relates to heat treating? My understanding is that it is called HT2005 and would be required registration for heat treaters that supply the big three in addition to TS. Young Kim from FORD STA was talking about it and said it is coming soon. I have not heard anything about this from any other source.
Any info on this would be appreciated. My understanding is that the big three got together to work on this and had the AIAG involved. I saw nothing on their website. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
__________________
Tom W
Semper FI!
"We're surrounded... that simplifies our problem." Chesty Puller
"For those who fight for it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know." --written on a C-ration box found after the siege of Khe Sanh 1968
|

16th November 2004, 04:31 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 62
|
|
Posts: 3,547
Thanks Given to Others: 71
Thanked 717 Times in 442 Posts
Karma Power: 413
|
|
|
__________________
Al
|

16th November 2004, 07:33 PM
|
 |
Post Responsibly
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA - USofA
|
|
Posts: 7,688
Thanks Given to Others: 1,588
Thanked 4,617 Times in 2,423 Posts
Karma Power: 878
|
|
Tom W - I had left you a message to check that thread. Check here
__________________
Sustainable conformity assessment must add value to all stakeholders
|

17th November 2004, 08:56 AM
|
 |
Living the Dream...
Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Michigan, USA
Age: 43
|
|
Posts: 414
Thanks Given to Others: 44
Thanked 44 Times in 35 Posts
Karma Power: 94
|
|
|
Thanks - I knew after I wrote the thread that I should have first done a search - when will I ever learn???
Thanks.
__________________
Tom W
Semper FI!
"We're surrounded... that simplifies our problem." Chesty Puller
"For those who fight for it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know." --written on a C-ration box found after the siege of Khe Sanh 1968
|

18th February 2005, 03:06 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: United States
Age: 50
|
|
Posts: 3
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 46 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Yes - Another Heat Treating Standard
I am a bit dismayed that the Big 3 think we need yet another heat treating standard to work to! I am in QA for a commerical heat treater that is already Ford W-HTX approved, does other work for Chrysler, Volvo, Freightliner, etc. and the vast preponderance of requirements makes it tough for us. We are also ISO and TS 16949:2002 certified, and while I agree that standards are needed, more documents do not a better supplier make. It would also be better if the Big 3 were not so hypocritical in their approach about making the supplier accountable to standards and practices that they do not require of themselves. Glad for the Cove, so I have some place to vent!
|

21st February 2005, 10:25 AM
|
 |
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Jul 2003
|
|
Posts: 924
Thanks Given to Others: 204
Thanked 214 Times in 155 Posts
Karma Power: 139
|
|
|
Did Ford cvome on site?
Quote:
|
In Reply to Parent Post by rdunnam
I am in QA for a commerical heat treater that is already Ford W-HTX approved... 
|
Hi
We are going thru Ford Q1 preparations and are trying to gear up for the W-HTX. We don't have any feeling for how detailed this will be.
Did Ford come on site to audit against HTX? Or did they let you send in a self assessment?
If they were on site, was it a knowledgeable heat treat person? How long did they audit? Did they use the checklist ans scoring system? Light weight or detailed?
Hope you can shed some light on this for us.
|

22nd February 2005, 08:29 AM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: United States
Age: 50
|
|
Posts: 3
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 46 Karma: 10 
|
|
Ford W-HTX Audit
Young Kim of Ford came on site and conducted the audit himself with our customer. He obviously knows heat treating, but he has some unconventional views on subjects. He also does not live in the "real world" of commercial heat treating; if it is in the standard, you'd better be doing it, whether it applies to your operation or not. Pay special attention to process controls and work instructions. Also, material control is a major concern (green parts in close proximity to parts in-process or completed). Remember: the majority of failures from heat treating facilities is due to mixed parts (part numbers that look alike, or green and finished parts).
|

22nd February 2005, 02:25 PM
|
 |
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Jul 2003
|
|
Posts: 924
Thanks Given to Others: 204
Thanked 214 Times in 155 Posts
Karma Power: 139
|
|
|
High level auditor
Quote:
|
In Reply to Parent Post by rdunnam
Young Kim of Ford came on site and conducted the audit himself with our customer. He obviously knows heat treating, but he has some unconventional views on subjects. He also does not live in the "real world" of commercial heat treating; if it is in the standard, you'd better be doing it, whether it applies to your operation or not. Pay special attention to process controls and work instructions. Also, material control is a major concern (green parts in close proximity to parts in-process or completed). Remember: the majority of failures from heat treating facilities is due to mixed parts (part numbers that look alike, or green and finished parts).
|
Thanks for the heads up. Is Young Kim the author of the HTX and the driving force behind the new TS Heat treat standard?
The HTX audit is very tough to score well on - we need to be well advanced to score 7s across the board.
Was the focus on SPC at the process level (times and temps) or product level (tensiles, Hardnesses <SQC>)?
I actually sort of look forward to this audit - it will show us pretty clearly where we stand compared to best in class.
Even preparing for it has made us better, I appreciate all the effort he put into it.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|