The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 6th December 2004, 08:39 AM
aravindkrish aravindkrish is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: May 2004
Location: India/Karnataka
Age: 31
 
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
aravindkrish has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via Yahoo to aravindkrish
Please Help! Data for reliability and measurability has not been established and included

Hi..!

I am working in Production Engineering Department of an auto ancillary. Our major customers are tier 1 suppliers of 2 wheeler and 4 wheeler.
As a part of manufacturing design out put, out auditor has marked ,"here is no evidence of manufacturing process design ouput comprehensively capturing some of the mandatory requirements. For example, refer to manufacturing design output for Part no 7041618 (Munjal Auto). The data for reliability and measurability has not been established and included at the manufacturing design output stage.
Also, the control plan for Part no C-3782203x/10, neither include nor reference the processes and process parameters involved in the manufacture of the part. "
..I dont understand anything abt this..
can anyone explain this to me..
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 6th December 2004, 10:09 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

First, did you discuss this with your auditor? Although they cannot consult they can provide more information then just stating you didn't meet a requirement.
The next step is to go back and review the design outputs. Did they contain reliability and measurable data. If so, then you need to incorporate the process parameters into the PFMEA and control plan to address the design outputs. You should address the "reliability" of the process to produce a part that meets the design requirements. You should address the "measurability"
of the process and the part to provide data for continual monitoring.
__________________
Sam Goody
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 6th December 2004, 11:22 PM
aravindkrish aravindkrish is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: May 2004
Location: India/Karnataka
Age: 31
 
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
aravindkrish has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via Yahoo to aravindkrish
Default

Sam,
Thanks for your reply..
We are actually a forging shop and i am not able to corelate reliability and measurable data..can u give me an example...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th December 2004, 07:12 AM
aravindkrish aravindkrish is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: May 2004
Location: India/Karnataka
Age: 31
 
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
aravindkrish has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via Yahoo to aravindkrish
Default

Can anyone help me in this regard..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 9th December 2004, 09:59 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

The very first step is to determine if your process has the required inputs, including those from the customer. Then, monitor the process for reliability and repeatability by taking some form of measurements,i.e., time, temperature, speeds, feeds, material weight, etc.This data can be put into a format, such as SPC, and then analysed. From these results conclusioons can be drawn as to corrective/preventive action.

Your customer may have reliability considrations for the part,i.e., life cycle. Your process should address this and all other customer requirements.
Your process has reliability considerations also, in the form of capability and repeatability.
__________________
Sam Goody
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Reporting 24/7/365 Reliability Data - MTBF Data for Customer Advertising Baggie Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 5 23rd February 2009 11:31 PM
TS16949 - section 7.3.3.2 - Design Output - Data for reliability 97miata Design and Development - Process and Product 5 2nd December 2007 01:36 AM
Reliability from Warranty data - We do not know the date put in service jacko Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4 2nd April 2007 01:50 PM
Failure Data of Cathode Stripping Machines - Reliability from the data attached alokb Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 7 29th March 2007 09:26 AM
Graphing MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) or Reliability Data of a System jag53 Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1 31st May 2006 07:52 AM



The time now is 04:17 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts