The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.
Reload This Page If there is no demands of (Cpk etc) limits on SC at PPAP?
Register Photo AlbumsBlogs FAQ Registered Visitors Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality

All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th December 2004, 11:30 AM
niotusen niotusen is offline
Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
  
Posts: 18
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 25
niotusen has disabled his/her Karma.
Default If there is no demands of (Cpk etc) limits on SC at PPAP?
Hello!
Have a customer that has not demand any SC measure on the PPAP.

We only do our SPC calculations etc on the SC measures? (wrong?)

How will you do?

Do you make your calculations and document them to your customer or do them but not document to the customer?

How will we do about the MSA methods?

What is the right thing to do?

Thanks..
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 8th December 2004, 01:44 AM
Howard Atkins's Avatar
Howard Atkins Howard Atkins is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
  
Posts: 2,412
Thanks Given to Others: 100
Thanked 448 Times in 253 Posts
Blog Entries: 8
Karma Power: 195
Karma: 4817
Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Howard Atkins
Default
See here for a similar discussion
http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=9294

The MSA issue is not relevant, you are supposed to perform studies on each type of measuring system in the control plan whether it is a SC or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by niotusen

Do you make your calculations and document them to your customer or do them but not document to the customer?
In fact you should do every thing for each PPAP, the level only refers to the documentation that you submit to the customer.

Hope this helps
__________________
You can’t fake quality any more than you can fake a good meal.
* William S. Burroughs
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.
Reload This Page If there is no demands of (Cpk etc) limits on SC at PPAP?

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Cpk = 1.33 if control limits are +/- 3 sigma - True? Annette SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 3 17th May 2006 07:09 PM
Can Minitab Return specification limits required to achieve a given Cpk? davis007 Using Minitab Software 11 13th December 2005 10:23 AM
AIAG PPAP requirement on Cpk cheahga Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 4 22nd November 2005 05:22 AM
Demands for MSA in Aerospace industry? Qaware Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10 24th May 2005 07:20 AM
SPC for Short Runs (Control Limits) vs. Precontrol charts (Specification Limits) Don Winton SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 7 10th October 1998 01:45 AM



The time now is 02:16 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.

Contact Marc - Elsmar Cove Site Home Page - Elsmar Cove Index (Ar) - Privacy Statement - Top


   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.
Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!
The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts