The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions > Process Audits and Layered Process Audits


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th January 2005, 01:10 AM
Elbarax's Avatar
Elbarax Elbarax is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philippines
Age: 34
 
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 20
Karma: 20
Elbarax has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via MSN to Elbarax
Please Help! Internal Process Audit Sampling using MIL-STD-105-E - 500 operators on 3 shifts

Hi guys! I'd like to know from other auditors' point of view, how can you say that you've covered / sampled out every process? This is the case, we have about 500 operators working on a 3 shift schedule. How many operators should I audit for compliance on the process? My Boss says to use the MIL-STD-105-E as a basis for the number of operators to be sampled out for a particular shift. Under the MIL-STD-105-E, he particualrly mentioned to use the special inspection sample sizes (S3). Is this valid? Thanks and more power.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 11th January 2005, 06:26 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is online now
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11569
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

I know there is at least one thread here where sampling in auditing is discussed. Basically, you are not going to be able to use something as 'scientific' as a sampling table because, amongst other things, you will not always easily know the population size (how many design records do we have?).

If I can find that thread later I'll link it up. In the meantime (unless someone else knows the thread off hand) maybe some others will comment on sample size during audits.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 11th January 2005, 06:58 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is online now
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11569
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Thread I found:
Sample Size in Auditing - Percentage audited when performing an internal audit
and
Auditing Statistically - A statistical approach to sample sizes
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11th January 2005, 08:23 AM
Govind's Avatar
Govind Govind is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fremont, California
 
Posts: 546
Thanks Given to Others: 13
Thanked 36 Times in 35 Posts
Karma Power: 50
Govind has disabled his/her Karma.
Default Discovery Sampling Defined and Discussed

One more on this same subject, Audit Sampling:
Audit Sampling methods - Discovery Sampling Defined and Discussed

Regards,
Govind.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11th January 2005, 07:47 PM
Elbarax's Avatar
Elbarax Elbarax is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philippines
Age: 34
 
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 20
Karma: 20
Elbarax has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via MSN to Elbarax
Default

thanks guys for the help!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions > Process Audits and Layered Process Audits

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Use of sampling plans like MIL-STD-105 E or ANSI Z1.4? AndyN SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 4 15th October 2008 10:35 PM
Asian Supplier Sampling Plans besides MIL-STD-105? My thought was ISO 2859? ikno88 Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 4 9th April 2008 08:52 AM
Designing a Mil-Std-105 or ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 Sampling Plan johnnybegood Design and Development - Process and Product 43 18th September 2006 02:41 PM
Why '105' and '414' in the military sampling plan standards (Mil-Std-)? cpgonzal Philosophy, Gurus, Controversy and Evolution 1 8th January 2004 02:07 PM



The time now is 09:35 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts