|
|
 |
|

13th September 2000, 09:23 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: Travelling around Europe
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 191
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 42 Karma: 27 
|
|
Vickers hardness testing - Gage R&R Study for Hardness m/c
Hi folks,
Can anyone help with a method to conduct a R&R study on a Vickers hardness testing m/c?
(We manufacture small rivets)
Thanks in advance.
Geoff
|

29th September 2000, 04:20 PM
|
|
|
|
The first rule for performing an R&R study is that the test be repeatable. Any device that is essentially a destruct test such as force gages and hardness testers cannot repeat. Therefore they fall beyond the scope of the R&R study.
Reliability may however, be obtained by applying statistical techniques to show capability of the gage itself. Repeated test that track the results with : Xbar & R charts, and a histogram to show the dispersal of the readings and figuring the Cp, Cpk will provide confidence in the readings. Unforunately, trying to determine how much of the variability in the process is attributable to the device itself is virtually impossible. Comparisons to the calibration standards shown in a graphical format is about the best you will be able to achieve. Luck to ya.
|

30th October 2000, 11:36 PM
|
|
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Sep 1998
Location: St. Marys, PA
|
|
Posts: 302
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 40 
|
|
|
We have a Ford auditor who is demanding gage R & R's on hardness testers. Is there someone out there who has performed one and can help me?
|

31st October 2000, 09:15 AM
|
|
An Original Cover!
Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: Greenville, SC
|
|
Posts: 471
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 54 Karma: 45 
|
|
|
This question has been asked before, but it has been awhile. You may want to do a search in the old forum. Also, EOMs for destructive testing are not unusual. You have to make some assumptions, but it can be done. Some of the texts mentioned in the Bibliography of the MSA manual contain information on destructive testing - one by Donald Wheeler, for instance. In fact, Wheeler's text book (reference 27) should have something in it.
|

25th December 2001, 12:00 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Looking for Details
Anyone have any recent info / comments on R&R in hardness testing?
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

11th February 2002, 12:24 PM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Sep 2000
Location: Denbigh, Wales, "Great" Britain.
Age: 36
|
|
Posts: 44
Thanks Given to Others: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 38 Karma: 20 
|
|
I would imagine it is possible to use a calibration block for your study. If you knew what hardness value(s) you needed to measure and obtained a certified calibration block for that value, then the Gauge R&R could be performed on that.
I say this because I assume it is calibrated somehow and that the calibration isn't a destructive calibration.
__________________
With is a stupid word to end a sentence with.
Never say Never.
|

11th February 2002, 07:29 PM
|
|
|
Hardness Tester Calibration
Supposing it is nearly impossible to find an accredited lab to do hardness tester calibration and supposing we perform verification with hardness blocks every time we use the tester which is quite often. The hardness blocks are ground and come with a cert traceable to NIST. We used to get them re-ground but dont anymore because they lose their accuracy. Are we legal if we stop external calibration?
|

11th February 2002, 07:29 PM
|
|
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Sep 1998
Location: St. Marys, PA
|
|
Posts: 302
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 40 
|
|
Hardness Tester Calibration
Supposing it is nearly impossible to find an accredited lab to do hardness tester calibration and supposing we perform verification with hardness blocks every time we use the tester which is quite often. The hardness blocks are ground and come with a cert traceable to NIST. We used to get them re-ground but dont anymore because they lose their accuracy. Are we legal if we stop external calibration?
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|