The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th January 2005, 03:46 PM
shyso shyso is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: united states
 
Posts: 3
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
shyso has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question 8.2.3.1 Reliability, Maintainability and Availability - How to satisfy requirement?

What is needed to satisfy the standard. Currently we develop an initial capability study (Ppk) and determine the failure rate. Does this mean that we will need to do a true reliability study (i.e. determine burn in time, optimal process time and wear out time)?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 18th January 2005, 06:19 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shyso

What is needed to satisfy the standard. Currently we develop an initial capability study (Ppk) and determine the failure rate. Does this mean that we will need to do a true reliability study (i.e. determine burn in time, optimal process time and wear out time)?
What I submitted was;
Reliability to produce - Cpk. Process effectiveness and efficiency
Maintainabilty - Maintenance schedules/history, preventive/predictive
maintenence.
Availability - the time that the process is available to produce the customers
product.
This info can be obtained easily by conducting the run@rate or PSO as required by the customer.
__________________
Sam Goody
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 21st January 2005, 12:52 AM
Sambasi Sambasi is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Aug 2002
Location: India
Age: 59
 
Posts: 84
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 35
Karma: 248
Sambasi is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.Sambasi is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.Sambasi is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.
Default 8.2.3.1 reliability, maintainability and availability

We have addressed these (for critical equipments in a process) by using basic defination in our system:-

Reliability = Mean Time Between Failure (MBTF)

Maintainablity = Mean time To Repair (MTTR)

Availability = MTBF/(MTBF+MTTR)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21st January 2005, 10:16 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sambasi

We have addressed these (for critical equipments in a process) by using basic defination in our system:-

Reliability = Mean Time Between Failure (MBTF)

Maintainablity = Mean time To Repair (MTTR)

Availability = MTBF/(MTBF+MTTR)
As you state these are standard terms for evaluating equipment,and this is one step in the process when completing a Run@Rate or PSO calculation. But as I read it the requirement for R/M/A applies to the process and not individual items of equipment.
__________________
Sam Goody
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21st January 2005, 11:36 PM
Sambasi Sambasi is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Aug 2002
Location: India
Age: 59
 
Posts: 84
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 35
Karma: 248
Sambasi is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.Sambasi is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.Sambasi is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.
Default 8.2.3.1 reliability, maintainability and availability

As you have stated correctly, this data is considered for process R/M/A.
Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Life Cycle Cost worksheet - Reliability and Maintainability of systems Fred12 Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1 23rd October 2008 11:57 PM
Asked to assist in Reliability and Maintainability planning for a new product al40 Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 3 31st January 2006 03:25 PM
IEC Standards - Reliability, Dependability, Maintainability, etc. Marc Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0 11th January 2006 02:32 PM
Seeking: Reliability & Maintainability Engineer - Aerospace - Stratford CT UniversalSS Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 0 23rd March 2005 11:11 AM
Reliability and Maintainability Design Review Guidelines Zanzi Design and Development - Process and Product 0 12th April 2002 11:43 AM



The time now is 09:37 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts